From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Sun May 30 2004 - 14:57:40 BST
Which ends on eaxctly the same point as Platt's last response ...
... begging the question "what morals".
Ian G
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.
> Good point in there ...
> This is evolution we are talking about ... clearly one mutation too far
> cannot be expected to "stick" and lead to a new stable generation - both
> halves of the evolution story are needed.
> The "feasible change" and the "supportive environment" - all change and no
> foundations is pure chaos - true "DQ leaves SQ in it's wake", but DQ needs
> SQ too.
>
> If the SQ supportive environment is "wrong" the DQ changes that survive as
> the next generation of SQ will also be "wrong".
> This is Blackmore's issue with memes. "Bad" ideas are equally (if not
more)
> likely to succeed than "good" ones.
> SQ needs to know which qualities it values in order to sustain the
platform
> for good DQ.
>
> Ian Glendinning
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 12:15 PM
> Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.
>
>
> > Hi Mark
> >
> > Hard to draw a line here between DQ/SQ
> > as DQ leaves SQ in its wake. There is perhaps
> > a balance between retaining the SQ that still
> > has its role/use and reaching higher -which
> > depends on SQ as its ladder.
> >
> > regards
> > David M
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Steven Heyman" <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com>
> > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 7:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.
> >
> >
> > > On 29 May 2004 at 14:07, David Morey wrote:
> > > Not entirely fair, there is clearly the possibility
> > > of reaching too far too soon, whereby in an attempt
> > > to improve the intellectual level freedom we may introduce freedoms
> > > that destroy the social levels rise above the biological.
> > >
> > > msh says:
> > > Sure. But this is a failure of static value patterns, attempting to
> > > bite off more than they're ready to chew, so to speak, that SQ failed
> > > to "latch" onto DQ, for now. This doesn't mean that DQ gives way to
> > > SQ, does it? If so, the MOQ, as I understand it, collapses.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > msh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> > > Mail Archives:
> > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> > > Nov '02 Onward -
> > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> > Mail Archives:
> > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> > Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
> >
> > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
> >
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 30 2004 - 15:13:33 BST