Re: MD Ronald Reagan

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 22:58:22 BST

  • Next message: Adam Watt: "Re: MD Ronald Reagan"

    Hi All,

    Here's a classic example of an ad hominem attack--so typical of liberals
    who, when their beliefs are challenged, are unable to respond
    intelligently.

    Regards,
    Platt

    From Adam Watt:
    > On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 07:57 pm, Platt Holden wrote:
    >
    > > Dear MarshaV:
    > >
    > > PH writes:
    > >>> I have no more intention of reading Chomsky's "Deterring Democracy"
    > >>> than you have of reading Rush Limbaugh's "See, I Told You So." There
    > >>> are thousands of books both pro and con America. A lifetime isn't long
    > >>> enough to read them all.
    > >>
    > >> Dear Platt,
    > >>
    > >> Are you really equating Noam Chomsky to Rush Limbaugh?
    > >
    > > Of course. In fact, Limbaugh's views are higher quality than Chomsky's.

    > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... etc. You MUST be
    > > joking.. if not I can only despair.
    >
    > Holy sheeeeeeet.. - how do you know when you haven't even read any of his
    > work??
    >
    > You're an idiot. No, really.
    >
    > HAVE YOU HAD A HEALTH CHECK LATELY????
    >
    > > He battles for freedom while Chomsky champions Marxism.
    >
    > Crapola.
    >
    > > Pirsig explains:
    > >
    > > "This soup of sentiments about logically nonexistent entities can be
    > > straightened out by the Metaphysics of Quality. It says that what is
    > > meant by "human rights" is usually the moral code of intellect-vs.
    > > -society, the moral right of intellect to be free of social control.
    > > Freedom of speech; freedom of assembly, of travel; trial by jury; habeas
    > > corpus; government by consent-these "human rights" are all
    > > intellect-vs.-society issues. According to the Metaphysics of Quality
    > > these "human rights" have not just a sentimental basis, but a rational,
    > > metaphysical basis. They are essential to the evolution of a higher level
    > > of life from a lower level of life. They are for real. (Lila, 24)"
    >
    > AND?? SO??
    >
    > IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BACK UP YOUR STUPID STATEMENTS????
    > .
    > . WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT???????
    >
    > DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY KNOW???????
    >
    > You are a bag of mad contradictions. Seriously, my 5 year old nephew is far
    > more intelligent, more capable of having a rational conversation, FAR FAR
    > more tolerant and open minded... he's basically more advanced in any
    > evolutionary term than you could hope to be. Ignorant fool.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 23:39:27 BST