RE: MD Ronald Reagan

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Jun 12 2004 - 20:47:20 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Coherence and MOQ levels. part 1"

    Mark Steven Heyman said to Platt:
    In NC's speech, I see no mention of Marx, or Communism, or
    Bolschevism, or anything other than the admirable strength and
    courage of the Vietnamese people in their struggle for self-
    determination.

    dmb says:
    Exactly. Rather than showing Chomsky to be a Marxist, Platt has only managed
    to put his own ignorance on display. (Using the word "socialism" or
    "proletariate" does not make one a Commie, you knee-jerk ignoramous.) I
    mean, anyone who thinks the Chomsky speech reflects Marxism surely does not
    know what the word means. (I'm sure Chomsky knows about and understands
    Marx, who did actually contribute some important ideas.) But this is not
    surprizing in the least. Platt drinks up the patriotic rhetoric of the right
    regardless of how cruel or foolish it is. The cruelty and foolishness of
    that war was predicated on a huge lie. The Vietnamese were not fighting for
    Marx, China or the Soveits. They were fighting to get their country back.
    This happpened repeatedly during the cold war. What was characterized as the
    fight against global communism was actually a series of struggles with
    anti-colonialists who simply didn't like being exploited and oppresses by
    distant nations.

    To prevent national independence is so very, very UNamerican. Helping the
    Vietnamese to throw off French rule and gain independence for themselves
    would have allowed to USA to avoid being murderous hypocrites. Instead, we
    crushed their declaration of independence despite the fact that it was
    modeled after ours....

    William Blum on Vietnam, 1950-73:
    The slippery slope began with siding with the French, the former
    colonizers and collaborators with the Japanese, against Ho Chi Minh
    and his followers who had worked closely with the Allied war effort
    and admired all things American. Ho Chi Minh was, after all, some
    kind of Communist. He had written numerous letters to President
    Truman and the State Department asking for America's help in winning
    Vietnamese independence from the French and finding a peaceful
    solution for his country. All his entreaties were ignored. Ho Chi
    Minh modeled the new Vietnamese declaration of independence on the
    American, beginning it with "All men are created equal. They are
    endowed by their Creator with ..." But this would count for nothing
    in Washington. Ho Chi Minh was some kind of Communist.
    Twenty-three years and more than a million dead, later, the United
    States withdrew its military forces from Vietnam. Most people say
    that the U.S. lost the war. But by destroying Vietnam to its core,
    and poisoning the earth and the gene pool for generations, Washington
    had achieved its main purpose: preventing what might have been the
    rise of a good development option for Asia. Ho Chi Minh was, after
    all, some kind of communist.

    dmb says:
    Platt Holden is, after all, some kind of fascist. And before he dismisses
    this as an ad hominem attack, I'd like to point out the my insulting remarks
    are just gravy and the meat has substance with or without it. The gravy also
    helps to explain how anyone could connect the MOQ with Ayn Rand or Rush
    Limbaugh. This move could only be made by a right-wing ignoramous. Entire
    books have been written about the logical and factual errors made by Rush
    and Rand holds the title of "worst novelist of all time". (I'm not making
    this up and its not a joke.) Platt reminds me of the neo-Nazi who appeared
    here a year or two ago thinking that Pirsig is a fan of Hitler, except that
    the Nazi had enough sense to eventuall figure it out and no longer
    participates in the forum.

    I've long ago given up on the idea of changing Platt's mind, but I hope to
    prevent others from being persuaded by his foolishness. I mean, show me a
    ditto head and I'll show you a person who can not think for themselves. I
    mean, its not a co-incidence that Platt is so full of cliches, inane
    platitudes and otherwise makes assertions we've all heard 1000 times before.
    It is not a surprize at all because stupid and boring go together like
    coffee and cigaretttes. YAWN!

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 12 2004 - 20:52:32 BST