Re: MD MOQ and Human Variation

From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:05:33 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD MOQ and Human Variation"

    Another interesting thing I read is that male humans have more genes in
    common with male chimps than they do with female humans (and vice versa, of
    course). And there are lots of genes on the X and Y that are related to
    more than just sex organs and hormones, for example the gene for folding
    fitted sheets is on the X, I think, whereas the gene for not worrying about
    stuff is on the Y. (well,actually they don't know what the genes do, but
    they are pretty sure they are active and do things besides shape the sex
    organs). They used to think the Y was pretty dead, a victim of the fact
    that it withers away by itself while the X is able to evolve do to the fact
    that there are two of them. But now they are startng to reevaluate the Y
    and think it actually does stuff around the house now and then. That's a
    bad development, but nothing we can't handle if we stick together.

    And about the difference between variatioins between species and within
    species, it ought to be pretty obvious. We can mate with other humans no
    matter what their hair color, but can't with chimps even if they have the
    same hair color, because we have different SEQUENCES. When Celera mapped
    the human genome, it turned out that they used CEO Craig Venter's DNA
    exclusively (males have an X and a Y, so they could do that, I guess). The
    government team used more people, but not many more. But it doesn't matter,
    the sequence would have been the same, no matter what "race" they mapped,
    for the same reason that all people can mate no matter what race.

    Clearly, when groups stop mating together for long enough times, they
    gradually evolve away from each other, first becoming racially distinct,
    until at a certain point not only don't they mate, but they can't mate, at
    least with fertile offspring.

    We have a lot in common with just about every species, it took a huge amount
    of evolution to get to the point where a circulatory system could replicate,
    and that DNA is shared by just about every species there is. But just as
    there are short chimps and tall chimps, there are short people and tall
    people, red heads and brunettes, and that is the sort of variation WITHIN a
    species that is 94% not correlatable to whatever "race" an individual is
    considered. Obviously, some of it is correlatable, such as skin color,
    which is associated with some gene somewhere, and a person pretty much has
    to have the color of skin their parents had, especially if their parents
    were of the same skin color, and their parents were too. It could include
    other traits too, even controversial ones like penis size. If you come from
    a long line of big penises, you'll probably be one too (i mean have one),
    unless you got your mom's side. (It's possible the gene for size of the sex
    organ is on some completely different chromosome, at least, that's how I
    would have designed it).

    The question for Paul Vogel is why does he think there should be no
    miscegenation? That's completely indefensible, people should be able to
    marry and have children with anyone they fall in love with, and if you ask
    me, bringing the "races" back together is a good thing. Inbreeding is the
    alternative, and that is scientifically proven to be unhealthy.

    Johnny

    >From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: moq_discuss@moq.org, owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
    >Subject: Re: MD MOQ and Human Variation
    >Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:32:54 -0400
    >
    >Hi All,
    >
    >MSH claims:
    > > Chimps and humans DO NOT have the same genes, though they do have
    > > many genes in common, approximately 98.5%.
    >
    >Nice thing about the Internet. You can always check someone's "facts."
    >
    >Reported in Discovery News:
    >
    >"May 20, 2003 - Chimpanzees share 99.4 percent of functionally important
    >DNA with humans and belong in our genus, Homo, according to a recent
    >genetic study.
    >
    >"Previous studies put the genetic similarity between humans and chimps at
    >95 to 99 percent, so the new figure suggests chimps and humans are even
    >more closely related than previously thought.
    >
    >"The findings are published in the current Proceedings of the National
    >Academy of Sciences."
    >
    >Check it out at:
    >
    >http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20030519/chimp.html
    >
    >Best,
    >Platt
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Getting married? Find great tips, tools and the latest trends at MSN Life
    Events. http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=married

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 19 2004 - 00:07:56 BST