Re: MD Noam Chomsky

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Mon Jun 21 2004 - 22:58:27 BST

  • Next message: Matt Borland: "Re: MD Maybe biology and religion can explain Mark's Opposition and links?"

    Hi gav,

    Thanks for the tip about the sits. I'f like to find out more about
    them. Any leads, other than the Bertolucci flick?

    Also, your comment about humans thinking they are superior to all
    other living beings (in the COSMOTHEISM thread) is well taken. I
    think my one main disagreement with Pirsig is that he seems to insist
    that other sentients are lower in the moral hierarchy. What saves
    the MOQ for me here is that we aren't justified in destroying
    "lesser" beings, unless they are a genuine threat. That's on the
    right track, at least.

    I think it can be argued that, in some respects, we aren't even
    morally equal to other animals. For example, we are the only animals
    I know of that will kill for fun, for entertainment, or just to put a
    few more bucks in the old bank account.

    Anyway, I talked about this, a little, in last month's thread
    entitled "Morality of Deadly Force."

    Best,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything." -- Henri Poincare'

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 22 2004 - 00:49:41 BST