Re: MD immoral irony?????

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:02:03 BST

  • Next message: Richard Loggins: "Re: MD The Final Cut"

    Hi Anthony,

    > The Zuni brujo example in LILA is designed to highlight the difference
    > between biologcal based degenerates like Vogel (who are anti-progressive by
    > leading us back into eighteenth century ideas about "race") and
    > intellectually based radicals such as the brujo (who are progressive).

    The brujo was an intellectually-based radical? That's news to me. A
    radical to be sure, but one with "religious powers," not intellectual -- a
    person who if you asked him why he acted the way he did couldn't answer,
    only "following a vague sense of betterness." Also, 18th century ideas
    about race are not biological-based since ideas, be definition, are
    intellectual. Finally, not all old ideas are "anti-progressive" ideas, the
    Ten Commandments for example.

    > The quality that Vogel displays is therefore not Dynamic but based on a
    > static latch which has now been largely discredited.

    Agree. It's a static latch. So is the current proscription against talking
    about racial differences. Any social value that attempts to block free
    inquiry is an attempt to maintain the status quo and, in MOQ terms, blocks
    DQ. Political correctness is a blight on intellect.

    > No doubt it will
    > appear here and there in the weaker minded members of the human race over
    > the next few centuries but its basically had its day.

    The term "weaker-minded" suggests an unattractive elitism, not to mention
    it's ad hominem overtone.

    For the record in no way do I find Cosmotheism worthwhile, primarily
    because it is intellectually vapid and, in many cases, meaningless. In
    other words, to borrow a phrase, it's weak-minded. :-)

    By the same token, I cannot intellectually close the door on
    investigations of racial differences that meet Pirsig's tests for truth --
    logical consistency, agreement with experience, and economy of
    explanation. To do so would violate the spirit of scientific inquiry and
    the MOQ itself.

    Best regards,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 25 2004 - 18:02:14 BST