Re: MD the metaphysics of free-enerprise

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 19:37:14 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD gravy & meat"

    Hi DMB

    spot on

    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 2:02 AM
    Subject: MD the metaphysics of free-enerprise

    > (Lila, 17) "What makes the free-enterprise system superior is that the
    > socialists, reasoning intelligently and objectively, have inadvertently
    > closed the door to DQ in the buying and selling of things. They closed it
    > because the metaphysical structure of their objectivity never told them DQ
    > exists."
    >
    > msh said:
    > What Platt doesn't understand is that Pirsig is speaking about a
    > theoretical "Free Market" that doesn't exist. (I'm giving Pirsig the
    > benefit of the doubt here.) Communism, then Socialism, were
    > REACTIONS to predatory capitalistic instincts thriving on the
    > Industrial Revolution and thereby concentrating wealth and power into
    > the hands of fewer and fewer individuals.
    >
    > dmb replies:
    > I think its pretty clear that Platt reads selectively, pretending an
    > exaggerated interpretation of his favorite quote trumps and/or negates all
    > other thoughts on the matter. The quote above might make it appear that
    > Pirsig is unequivocally pro-capitalist, provided that the quote was the
    > only thing Pirsig ever wrote on the topic. In fact, in the very same
    chapter
    > Pirsig describes NYC's free-enterprise as a Giant that "devours their
    lives
    > for its own purposes just as surely as farmers devour the flesh of farm
    > animals", and points out that capitalism is LESS MORAL than socialism and
    > that "the conservatives who keep trumpeting about the virtues of free
    > enterprise are normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are
    > just doing the usual cover-up for the rich in their age-old exploitation
    of
    > the poor".
    >
    > What Pirsig does in that chapter is examine the classic economic rivals in
    > MOQ terms. He's looking at the debate in terms of levels of values and in
    > terms of the static/dynamic distinction. In fact, the virtue most loudly
    > "trumpeted" by Platt in his case for capitalism is described in that same
    > chapter as something that "neither the socialist NOR the capitalist ever
    got
    > figured out. It's a higher form of evolution. Its and intellectually
    guided
    > society, not just a society that is guided by mindless traditions. That's
    > what gives socialism its drive." So in terms of the levels, socialism is
    > associated with the fourth, intellectual level and the capitalism with the
    > third, social level. And as we read elsewhere an intellectually guided
    > society in absolutely morally superior to one that is not. In terms of the
    > static/Dynamic split, the metaphysical blindness that led socialism to
    > inadvertantly close the door on DQ is a problem that infects the Modern
    West
    > as a whole. Pirsig is simply pointing out that capitalism was
    inadvertantly
    > correct. It leaves the door open, despite the fact that they haven't the
    > first clue about what actually makes it work.
    >
    > And so, even though I disagree with Mark and think Pirsig is talking about
    > the theory AND actual practice of the free market system, I also think
    he's
    > come to the right conclusion; the MOQ is recommending some kind of
    socialism
    > that DOESN'T inadvertently close the door on DQ. We'd want it to be an
    > intellectually guided society AND a dynamic society at the same time.
    >
    > msh said:
    > Capitalism is NOT interested in free markets, and never has been.
    > In a true free market economy Capitalism would self-destruct in a
    > single generation. Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Grumman, GE,
    > Westinghouse, most banks, wouldn't last for a second without HUGE
    > taxpayer subsidies in the forms of R&D grants (if not outright
    > turnover of taxpayer developed technology) , loans, tax breaks and,
    > when necessary, bail outs. So when Platt and others speak of
    > Capitalism and Free Market economies as if they are synonymous, they
    > are victims of propaganda of the first and most obvious order.
    >
    > dmb says:
    > Sure, traditional institutions like banks, defense contractors and energy
    > companies rely on mindless tradition becasue they basically define that
    > tradition. They know that a rational and intellectual examination of
    things
    > is a huge threat to their postion of power and priveledge. They know it
    > threatens their "age old exploitation of the poor". One of the sadder
    things
    > is that nearly all of the largest corporations exercise their power with
    > advertising dollars, almost literally controlling what the entire society
    > thinks it wants, needs and desires. Collectively, they have the power to
    > control what the millions come to value, even if the object of desire
    > doesn't have much quality or appeals to lower level values. In a
    > "free-market" consumer society, everyone has to play a game of seduction
    and
    > die the death of a salesman. There are millions who waste their lives in
    > pursuit of these empty, phony promises. It's depressing as hell.
    >
    > Platt said:
    > A cultural characteristic that says dedicating yourself to getting an
    > education is "acting white" and therefore not to be valued is immoral.
    >
    > dmb says:
    > There is an anti-intellectual streak down the middle of American culture
    > that is a mile wide. All Platt has done is spot it in blacks and not in
    > whites. And there are many reason why SOME black Americans exhibit
    > anti-intellectual attitudes. Once upon a time black literacy was not a
    > social goal advocated by progressives and liberals, it was a crime
    > punishable by death. And then there is the long history of racist books
    that
    > proclaim the intellectual inferiority of the people so deprived and
    abused.
    > This tactic of blaming the victim is very old. Despise the oppressed for
    > being destroyed and humiliated at your own hand. Break his back and tell
    him
    > to improve his posture. Tis very useful in easing the conscience of the
    > exploiters to believe the losers somehow deserve it. This is ancient. Even
    > the classical Greeks rationalized the holding of slaves by convincing
    > themselves that the uncivilized barbarians were better off being forced to
    > serve their superiors than being free and at home. That's why Pirsig calls
    > it "age old" exploitation.
    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 27 2004 - 22:28:30 BST