RE: MD gravy & meat

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2004 - 18:33:04 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD immoral irony?????"

    Wim Nusselder said:
    David B. is completely free to pour gravy over others (and me on occasion)
    as far as I am concerned. I only ask him not to do so. If he refuses, I
    accept. He knows that he risks that his post are read less thoroughly by me
    in the future.

    dmb says:
    Wim, as I see it, your requests for restraint and civility contains the
    implication that my concerns and criticisms amount to little more than petty
    bickering and childish name-calling. This offends me. For example, my
    battles with Platt, which promted your requests, do not strike you as
    important because its all about the conflict between the third and fourth
    level. You do not see the urgency or importance of the issues because you
    have your own ideas about the third and fourth levels and those ideas hardly
    resemble Pirsig's. The battle Pirsig describes is not unique to America
    either. The social level Nazi occupied your country not too long ago and
    today it is probably the most liberal nation on earth. This
    social/intellectual conflict is going on in your part of the world too and
    yet you practically refuse to even aknowledge its existence. This offends me
    too. So, if it seems like I am not taking your request seriously, its
    because I think you're missing the point of what I'm saying and acting to
    undermine its importance. Its because I think YOU'RE not taking ME
    seriously. Nor do you seem to appreciate my sense of humor....

    Wim continued:
    He explicitly refused 19 Jun 2004 14:26:54 -0600. He implicitly refused (and
    answered my 20 Jun 2004 07:00:07 +0200 post) in the PS addressed to me at
    the end of his 20 Jun 2004 15:26:40 -0600 post. He doesn't take my request
    seriously. Otherwise he would have suggested me not to read that last e-mail
    in the beginning rather than at the end (when I already had read it).
    Because of that I will not discuss the content of his 20 Jun 2004
    15:26:40 -0600 post with him (as you suggested 21 Jun 2004 20:30:54 -0700):
    too much gravy for my liking. I still discuss other points with him, though,
    and I still read most of his posts quite thoroughly.

    dmb says:
    See? You honestly didn't see the humor in a P.S. suggestion not to read the
    post? Maybe its a problem with translation or something, but I thought the
    logic of it was the funny part and that should be the same in any culture.

    In any case, I think the problem stems from our fundamental disagreement
    about the levels. Because you have re-defined them we are literally talking
    about two different things and nothing I say will be of any value, no matter
    how politely it is expressed.

    And you know what else? Freedom of speech and freedom of expression go
    together as part of the same right. We are allowed to be angry, outraged and
    alarmed and we are all allowed to show it. Asking me to be nicer is like
    asking me to feel differently about the issues. Except for jokes and such, I
    mean what I say. And the gravy analogy suggests that its not essential to
    the substance of the meal, but it also suggests that the meal is much
    improved by adding it. I think you should try to see how this is so. You
    could even check the archives to test the idea retroactively if you like. I
    think you'll see that what looks to you like an unnecessary insult actually
    functions as a pithy little summary of the larger point being made. It
    serves to boil the essential point down to a sentence or phrase that is
    endowed with meaning by all that has come before. Go ahead. See for
    yourself. Its not even a rhetorical or literary devise I consciously adopted
    or developed. Its just my style. That's how I talk. That's how I think. So
    asking me to stop is like asking me to be somebody else. This offends me.

    If there is a post I would ask you to read thoroughly, this is it. Read it
    more than once. Maybe then you can concentrate on the substance and actually
    engage in on the issues (with words used as they are conventionally
    defined.) rather than complain about my style. That would NOT offend me.

    Thanks.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 27 2004 - 22:35:56 BST