Re: MD Pirsig the Critic

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:15:01 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "MD SQ-SQ tension in Human relationships (again). I"

    Ah brilliant Rick.
    Great find.

    This is the artcle where Pirsig was subsequently branded a "bigot" yes ?
    I'll get the content up on my site now - I didn't put the original critical
    artice up because I didn't have this article that had caused the response,
    so it had no context.

    Magic
    Ian G

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Valence" <valence10@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:45 AM
    Subject: MD Pirsig the Critic

    > Hi all,
    > My recent withdrawal from the MD notwithstanding, I just had to share this
    > one with the friends I know I still have here :-)
    >
    > Anyway, following up on a lead I found at Ian Glendinning's wonderful
    > Psybertron website (http://www.psybertron.org/pirsigpages.html), I
    shuffled
    > down to the basement of the New York Public Library and eventually was
    able
    > to locate this "long lost" Pirsig article. It's a book review he wrote
    for
    > the The New York Times Sunday Book Review which was published on June 8,
    > 1975. I had to retype the whole thing from a blurry print-out of a
    > microfilm archive. Words that (I think) were in italics are herein
    rendered
    > with asterisks.
    >
    > It's my gift to you.
    >
    > Enjoy...
    >
    > and take care
    > rick
    > --------------------------------------------------
    > A husband without a wife
    >
    > ONE MAN, HURT
    >
    > A Shattering Account of the End of a Happy Marriage. By Albert Martin. 278
    > pp. New York: Macmillan. $8.95
    >
    > By Robert Pirsig (Robert Pirsig, author of "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
    > Maintenance," is now a Guggenheim Fellow writing a second book.)
    >
    > "One Man, Hurt" describes in detail the agonizing chronology of a divorce,
    > shows the life that preceded and surrounds it, and calls for opposition
    > to the social trends the author feels produced it. As a document of
    marital
    > bliss and as an attack on feminism it backfires completely. The author's
    > atrocious suburban banality drowns out everything else.
    > We never get done reading how much the author loves his wife, his
    children,
    > washing dishes, doing diapers, his house (a suburban one in Connecticut),
    > his neighborhood, his job, his church, his priest, his mother and father,
    > his mother-in-law, his father-in-law, the Little League, kid's hockey, TV,
    > their cats and dogs. For him suburban life is some sort of continuous
    > ceremony, a ritual he must have learned to imitate watching old Andy Hardy
    > shows on the late-late movie on TV. Then, when his wife tells him she
    wants
    > a divorce to "discover herself," he cries *what* is she *talking* about?
    > What more can he possibly *give* her? Throughout the book, he never finds
    > out.
    >
    > However, if one can transcend this banal level, one can find in this book
    > some unexpected literary merit. The author tells us how miserable he is,
    > yet because he doesn't know how to render it properly we never see it for
    > ourselves. But he really is miserable. As one reads on, one begins to
    see
    > beneath the surface of his plastic suburban style and acquire tolerance
    and
    > even sympathy for his predicament. His one saving grace begins to shine
    > through: he is not an arrogant man. He sincerely tries to learn what is
    > wrong, tries to change himself. He really *is* hurt, and he hasn't
    > deliberately hurt anyone else to provoke it. What are the real causes?
    > What could he have done? he asks. What can he do now? It would be an
    act
    > of arrogance not to try to answer.
    >
    > The first key is his pathetic clinging to the material symbols of
    > middle-class life. This, one discovers, is a poor boy, ambitious and
    > undoubtedly hard-working, from a Polish Roman Catholic childhood in New
    > England. Everything he loves, down to his cats and dogs, are symbols of
    his
    > upward rise from the background of his immigrant parents. Now, like Jay
    > Gatsby and Sammy Glick before him, he sees it all turning to ashes. The
    > central shining symbol of his own aspirations, the ballet dancer on the
    New
    > York stage whom he persuaded to marry him, wants out. She sees her whole
    > life is just a cheap symbol, like everything else in his world and she
    wants
    > something more real.
    >
    > She asks him to look inward, but he doesn't know what she is talking
    about.
    > For them there is no inward self, only roles. He is a totally
    > other-directed man, a result of a background he cannot change and cannot
    > even understand. At the superficial level of his own understanding there
    is
    > no difference between his New England Catholicism and his wife's Texas
    > Methodism, but at a level he is unaware of there are very deep
    differences,
    > and these, I think, are the root of it all.
    >
    > I once taught a college course where I asked the class, "Is the an
    absolute
    > external morality?" And I was astonished to discover that, without
    > exception, every Catholic student said yes, and every Protestant student
    > said no. There is a profound division here.
    >
    > For the traditional Catholic layman, morality is external. The author
    > remembers vividly the terror he felt in parochial school when he saw what
    > happened to Cecelia after she defied Sister Anastasia. He still feels it.
    > For him the other-directed authoritarian system of his moral education has
    > become the pattern of his life, and we see in page after page his
    professed
    > love of, and obedience to, authority. He is a system player. That is how
    > he had to learn it. You love the system and the system loves you. Now
    the
    > system is failing and he is without a clue and in terror as to why this
    > should happen.
    >
    > Protestants, including his own wife, tend to take more heed of their own
    > consciences when coming to moral decisions. This is more true among
    > Methodists than many other sects, more true of all, I think, among
    > Protestants residing in the state of Texas. In fact, if there's one thing
    > the traditional Texas Protestant knows how to do better than anything
    else,
    > it's how to make up his *own* ornery mind about what is right and what is
    > wrong, and *keeps* it made up, come hell or high water, or anything else
    you
    > might want to run in front of him. Texas girls see this in their fathers
    > and grow up unconsciously expecting to find it in every man. This,
    > tragically, in the one thing the author cannot supply. He must run to
    > authorities for every moral decision and every major idea in his head.
    And
    > by Texas Protestant standards this makes him a moral weakling and a
    failure,
    > and this, I think, is why his wife cannot love him. And there is nothing
    he
    > can do about it.
    >
    > Nevertheless, I think this book will provide a happy ending for its
    author.
    > It is, among other things, a 278-page marital advertisement which should
    > produce dozens, if not hundreds, of matrimonial offers. I hope, for his
    own
    > sake, that his final choice is someone who really appreciates him for the
    > good man he is. Preferably, it should be an Eastern, Polish, Roman
    Catholic
    > woman, heavy-boned and big-breasted, domineering and authoritarian, from a
    > childhood of poverty like the one he got away from by marrying the little
    > ballet dancer from Texas. She should love him earthily, and also her
    > children and her church discipline and the suburban life, because she
    finds
    > in these things the meaning of life itself. He deserves it.
    >
    > As for his divorced wife, I don't know what will happen. She has a hard
    > life coming.
    >
    > But there's a feeling, rising up from deep inner sources, that in the end,
    > when it is all over for all of us, it will be she who goes to heaven long
    > before he does.
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 17:18:55 BST