RE: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jul 09 2004 - 21:14:40 BST

  • Next message: Dan Glover: "Re: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise"

    Hi Dan, All:

    Dan wrote:
    > And believe me when I say I'm not helping anyone. I don't happen to believe
    > we as human beings have the capacity to help others. I provide an
    > opportunity for others to help themselves. The motivation has to be theirs.

    Truer words were never spoken. History as proven time and time again that
    "helping" others has caused untold misery, whether it be the priests of
    the Inquisition helping heretics save their souls by burning them at the
    stake or Communists and Nazis helping societies achieve greatness by
    slaughtering millions.

    Those who help are always in a position of power over the helpless and the
    helpless know it. This not only feeds the helper's ego but causes
    resentment on the part of the helpless. No one choose to be helpless
    except those who fake helplessness to attain favors from gullible helpers.

    We really don't know how to help others without being arrogant (I know
    what's best for you), prescient (I can see foresee all consequences) and
    paternalistic (you depend on me.) All these feed the do-gooder's ego. He
    needs for people to be down so he can feel up. He wants to be admired for
    his compassion and unselfishness. Most of all, he enjoys the power of
    being in a position to help.

    Pirsig wrestles with the issue of helping in Chapter 25 of Lila. The
    "light" seems to be trying to tell him that he should help Lila. "You
    can't just run off from other people without injuring yourself too."

    But then he recalls how his Aunt and himself were treated when pronounced
    insane.

    "The hardest thing to deal with," he writes, "was the righteousness of the
    sane. When you're in agreement with the sane they're a great comfort and
    protection, but when you disagree with them. . . they're dangerous. Then
    they'll do anything. The sinister thing that struck the most fear in him
    was they'd do it in the name of kindness . . . He saw that the sane always
    know they are good because their culture tells them so. Anyone who tells
    them otherwise is sick, paranoid, and needs further treatment."

    Towards the end of the book after Rigel takes Lila off Pirsig's hands, the
    author writes:

    "He had a feeling of freshness as he walked back to the boat. What a
    fantastic day this was. How many people are ever lucky enough to clean the
    slate like this? They're all stuck with their endless problems. He stood
    on a mound of sand beside some juniper bushes and said "Ahhhh!" He threw
    out his arms. Free! No idols, no Lila, no Rigel, no New York, no more
    America even. Just free!

    Here Pirsig has escaped from guilt and "political correctness" as well as
    the stifling blanket of social morality and the "monomyth" that Arlo
    mentions in his latest post to me in the free enterprise thread. He has
    thrown away, if but temporarily, the cultural glasses through which he and
    we judge others. For the moment he is "just free" -- the highest good in
    the MOQ.

     "He looked up in the sky and whirled. Ahhh, that felt good!"

    Best,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 09 2004 - 21:17:09 BST