Re: MD Maxwell's "Coherence" and the MOQ

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 13 2004 - 14:02:15 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Re: Love and hate in the MOQ"

    Hi David M,

    > This loss of self-awareness is important stuff.
    > Somehow we can become absorbed into the world
    > we are experiencing. This seems to me to be about
    > getting outside of SOM. Let's remember
    > that quality=experience=reality. So here we are
    > experiencing the world. If we do not draw any lines
    > between subject and object where can we say
    > consciousness is located? In the brain? This would
    > be an SOM mistake. When we hit the perfect tennis shot
    > we are completely at one with the elements of the world.
    > We know what the ball will do as soon as we hit it.
    > Or we see the football tackle coming and we perfectly
    > step out of the way. Carl Jung spoke of enjoying a beautiful
    > view so much that he felt he was absorbed into the landscape.
    > And when we simply 'see' we do not think of the view as being in our
    > heads, the world is 'simply there', so that we are experiencing the world
    > not in our heads but in the world, 'out there'. As I said
    > reality=experience. So experience is therefore a coming together into a
    > space/clearing/consciousness of at least Man and World but most often
    > Man/Language/Being as Heidegger describes it. Experience is only possible
    > when there is a world to experience. What is a person? What is it to be a
    > person? It is not to be a body, rather it is to be the experience of
    > 'knowing a world'. If you had a body and no world you would be nothing like
    > the reality that we call a human being. Getting any Heidegger read Anthony,
    > you should?
     
    A nice description of what Maslow named the "peak experience." It's the
    experience we have when overwhelmed by Dynamic Quality. I feel DQ
    most often in experiences of beauty, like Jung. But it can occur on a
    football field, too. It happened to me once in that setting.

    I agree with DMB, however, that the idea of "coherence" and it's attendant
    long-winded explanations don't add much to the understanding of the MOQ
    (not that I fully understand the MOQ myself).

    In any case, thanks for a well-honed summary of the non-dual experience.

    Best,
    Platt
         

    > regards
    > David M
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 13 2004 - 14:01:20 BST