From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 19:10:03 BST
"I think Paul's assertion that "the MOQ is an atheistic system" goes too
far. (According to our dear friend, Mr. Webster, "atheism" denies the
existence of any kind of God or deity, not just "the usual,
anthropomorphic" kind.) Since, in the MOQ, DQ is associated so closely
with religious mysticism, it can't rightly be called an atheistic
system." Date: Sun Feb 15 2004 - 18:49:18 GMT
I think you now have the context in which to understand my statement
that the MOQ is an atheistic system.
Hi guys
To me it is obvious that alot of the talk about
god is bad stuff and needs dropping, but clearly
some of the stuff about god was clearly about
what we now call quality or DQ. So it was not all
bad and some of it may be useful. Anyone disagree?#
Calling this simply atheism is misleading I feel, because
the MOQ is all about trying to rediscover our values and
religion at its best had better values than nihlistic secularism
I feel.
regards
David M
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 26 2004 - 19:47:52 BST