From: Paul Turner (paul@turnerbc.co.uk)
Date: Mon Aug 02 2004 - 11:59:15 BST
Hi Mel
Mel said:
Each level of evolution that has emerged from the level before, becomes
less constrained and capable of variation that is baroque and rococo in
flavor compared to the level below. However, now that we see the
Characteristic of Emergence as the spoor of Dynamic Quality, we can
actively choose to pursue the dynamic 'vector' without getting caught up
in the more static turbulence, the interesting, but insignificant
baroque and rococo 'decoration' of intellect. We can aim at the gap in
intellect where the next level will realize itself in emergence beyond
intellect.
Paul:
An interesting post, Mel, but I'm not sure what your main point is.
Is it about the parallels between "emergence" and Dynamic evolution?
Is it that intellectual argument about the MOQ's finer points is
"insignificant decoration?"
Do you see (some of) these discussions as a frivolous adornment to
Pirsig's system?
Is it that you think we are arguing for the sake of self-esteem?
Are (some of) our discussions holding the MOQ back?
All of the above?
Cheers
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 02 2004 - 12:02:08 BST