Why are drugs usually considered morally wrong? They are a device to enable
dynamic quality, think about it, they alter your perceptions so that the
things that you are seeing/feeling, are the same as always, but your
perception of them is altered - dynamic quality, you are seeing things with
new eyes. It is only when abuse/addiction occurs that these dynamic
patterns subside to static patterns. These patterns are mental/intellectual
which in the MoQ is morally 'better' than social or biological patterns. I
think that one of the reasons for their opression is the damage which is
able to be caused to biological and social static patterns, but static
patterns are morally inferior to dynamic patterns so this argument does not
stand. Obviously drugs can cause great harm, but I believe they can also
bring about great advances in understanding which are suppressed by the
holders of the reigns of static social patterns. Just an idea.
evolve
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:25 BST