Sriram,
I agree with Platt-- This is a great!!!
I am a little hesistant to say it successfuly embeds SOM into MOQ-but it is
one of the best attempts I have seen.
The levels are subjective-objective not subject-object so I am still a little
unclear at how the latter view is not discarded.
You say it is not discarded but then call it a formerly known?
I agree entirely with the switch you describe but how exactly does the new
view embed the old one.
Erin
>Sriram summed it up beautifully:
>
>> The SOM is not discarded. The MOQ would not have the value that it does if
>> it were. It says what were formerly known as objects are inorganic and
>> biological patterns of value, and what were formerly known as subjects are
>> now social and intellectual patterns of value. They are related through an
>> evolutionary structure. The quality idea does not need to leave intellect
>> because it finds a home within intellectual patterns. It's only Dynamic
>> Quality which must leave intellect and not be embedded within it or any
>> other static pattern.
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:18 BST