From: Matt the Enraged Endorphin (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 00:55:56 GMT
Platt,
>Now I'm confused by why you have a problem with Quality being
>absolute. If it's always everywhere (ubiquitous) like reality, it's absolute
>is it not?
Most of the problems that are arising out of the Rortyan "position" I'm
forwarding, including the linguistic turn, are because they are being
funneled into traditional categories (which is exactly what Scott accused
me of doing to him).
I've covered the absolute problem before, I believe, in fact, in direct
correspondence with you Platt. I think they were in the "Unofficial Rorty
Dictionary" thread. At the least, I believe I've gone over some of the
arguments lately in the "Absolute Quality between ZMM and Lila" thread. I
would specifically reference you to Scott and my series of posts.
Matt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 21 2002 - 01:02:22 GMT