From: Trivik Bhavneni (trivik@stwing.upenn.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 04:16:24 GMT
> >Now I'm confused by why you have a problem with Quality being
> >absolute. If it's always everywhere (ubiquitous) like reality, it's absolute
> >is it not?
say we had 5 coins in frount of us.
the number of coins is absolute, i.e. unchangeing - 5
now say the number of coins abruptly changes to 10
oops...so the number was not absolute.
but you may say that then what was absolute that coins were in frount of
us.
say we look again and find 10 lemons instead
eer...oops - seams that what was unchangeing was that there were physical
objects in frount of us.
say i look again - and there is no physical object, but only a trio of
emotions - whatever that means.
whatever it is that remains constant, i.e. is absolute - say the fact that
there is. call it quality. there is quality. you can not use a word like
absolute for quality.
they mean the samething - which is miis leading
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 21 2002 - 04:16:33 GMT