Re: MD (Wim is it.) Focus forum - round four

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Mon Nov 25 2002 - 07:22:01 GMT

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD Can Only Humans Respond to DQ?"

    Dear Patrick,

    I don't want to be a spoilsport, so I'll provide you all with a quote for
    round four, but I don't know if I will be able to participate much myself.
    (I still have postings from two weeks ago to answer.) It is a quote that
    more or less founds my understanding of 'patterns of values'.

    I'll try to answer your question 'What ARE we to do then? I don't know, do
    you?' in due course in a separate thread. (It was your reply to my 'Just
    retaliating, going to war, "ending a regime" won't do. We must be aware
    of our own "clinging to static patterns", too and strive to dynamise our
    reactions.' You agreed that 'that's in one sentence what we ought to do',
    but added 'only it remains abstract, not concrete'.)

    From 'Lila' chapter 9:
    'Phaedrus saw that not only a man recovering from a heart attack but also a
    baby gazes at his hand with mystic wonder and delight. He remembered the
    child Poincare referred to who could not understand the reality of objective
    science at all but was able to understand the reality of value perfectly.
    When this reality of value is divided into static and Dynamic areas a lot
    can be explained about that baby's growth that is not well explained
    otherwise.
    One can imagine how an infant in the womb acquires awareness of simple
    distinctions such as pressure and sound, and then at birth acquires more
    complex ones of light and warmth and hunger. We know these distinctions are
    pressure and sound and light and warmth and hunger and so on but the baby
    doesn't. We could call them stimuli but the baby doesn't identify them as
    that. From the baby's point of view, something, he knows not what, compels
    attention. This generalized "something," White-head's "dim apprehension," is
    Dynamic Quality. When he is a few months old the baby studies his hand or a
    rattle, not knowing it is a hand or a rattle, with the same sense of wonder
    and mystery and excitement created by the music and heart attack in the
    previous examples.
    If the baby ignores this force of Dynamic Quality it can be speculated that
    he will become mentally retarded, but if he is normally attentive to Dynamic
    Quality he will soon begin to notice differences and then correlations
    between the differences and then repetitive patterns of the correlations.
    But it is not until the baby is several months old that he will begin to
    really understand enough about that enormously complex correlation of
    sensations and boundaries and desires called an object to be able to reach
    for one. This object will not be a primary experience. It will be a complex
    pattern of static values derived from primary experience.
    Once the baby has made a complex pattern of values called an object and
    found this pattern to work well he quickly develops a skill and speed at
    jumping through the chain of deductions that produced it, as though it were
    a single jump. This is similar to the way one drives a car. The first time
    there is a very slow trial-and-error process of seeing what causes what. But
    in a very short time it becomes so swift one doesn't even think about it.
    The same is true of objects. One uses these complex patterns the same way
    one shifts a car, without thinking about them. Only when the shift doesn't
    work or an "object" turns out to be an illusion is one forced to become
    aware of the deductive process. That is why we think of subjects and objects
    as primary. We can't remember that period of our lives when they were
    anything else.
    In this way static patterns of value become the universe of distinguishable
    things. Elementary static distinctions, between such entities as "before"
    and "after" and between "like" and "unlike" grow into enormously complex
    patterns of knowledge that are transmitted from generation to generation as
    the mythos, the culture in which we live.'

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 25 2002 - 07:22:44 GMT