RE: MD acausal/ psuedo-science / wonder

From: Glenn Bradford (gmbbradford@netscape.net)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 18:28:35 GMT

  • Next message: Paul Goddard: "Re: MD MOQ FOR DUMMIES, Please"

    "Erin N." <enoonan@kent.edu> wrote:

    >>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
    >>>Well I guess in my mind the opposite of causal
    >>>would be chance no--no relationship.
    >>>Acausal there is a connection, relationsip but
    >>>its not A -B causality.
    >>>The idea of acausality is the interconnectedness
    >>>of everything.
    >>>
    >>>Lots of things affecting behavior.
    >>In other words "acausal" is causal, except when it's A -B causal.
    >>Please distinguish "causality" from "A -B causality".
    >>Glenn
    >
    >I think of causality of linear relationships.
    >You can drop the AB just to represent the tracing
    >of that linear relationship.
    >No difference.
    >
    >erin
    OK. So what's linear causality?

    __________________________________________________________________
    The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp

    Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 18:29:56 GMT