From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 21:57:06 GMT
Dear Rudy,
I definitely caught an instant liking for New Yersey from your posting (even
if I would have to find my old school atlas to look it if I would really
want to know where the hell to find that bit of American backwater). (-;
I fully agree with what you're writing (the genius of the static/dynamic
distinction and the risks of overdoing evolutionary morality). You're asking
the right questions (how to implement the MoQ) and are having the rights
doubts (whether the MoQ -in its present form- would change people's behavior
in the right direction).
You let's proceed to my 2 billion dollar answer (-;
You asked:
'I suppose that my biggest question is, where does all this bottom out? Just
how would you implement all of
this? How would you propose to teach the world to think in MOQ terms and
abandon SOM?'
What about just applying it in your own life and in your own roles in the
world? Teach if you're a teacher. Write if you're a writer. Plough and sell
what you reap when you're a farmer.
If the version of the MoQ you apply IS a high quality intellectual pattern
of value, others will copy it. The best version will survive and
revolutionize the world ... or not, if what Pirsig derides as SOM was better
after all...
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 22:03:39 GMT