From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 06:58:59 GMT
Dear Matt,
Again more words than needed.
I agree with your:
'I think the Dynamic-static link with philosophy-philosophology is a good
move to make, but I think you have to
be prepared to gloss over some of the things Pirsig says, particuarly about
there being no philosophers anymore. I think it would be best to chalk up
the philosophical null-class to rhetorical overkill.'
This agreement was already applied when I wrote:
'I agree with your 8 Dec 2002 18:02:53 -0600 posting.'
I indeed still have good memories from our 'Oakeshott' discussion, if only
because I'm still regularly recycling statements I made in that discussion.
It also is a good reference point to compare your present contributions
with. They have definitely improved (which doesn't mean that your
contributions then were bad, far from that).
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 10 2002 - 08:01:38 GMT