From: Mari (mld2001@adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Dec 29 2002 - 12:12:14 GMT
David said:
Its all Quality. The
> creator is DQ and the creation is SQ, so to speak. The evolutionary
morality
> of conflicting static patterns makes sense in a larger context where
Dynamic
> Quality is the source and goal of these migrating static patterns.
Mari says: Okay David, here is an example of my need to ask for clarity. i
don't think i'm taking anything out of context that distorts the whole of
what you are trying to convey. Help me visualize the creator as DQ and the
creation as SQ.
As i'm reading your words attempting to make sense of what it is you're
saying, i come to that statement and i stop....a picture pops into my head
that does not square with that statement. Let me tell you why. The statement
is too static. Too defintie. Too absolute as i understand creator/creation.
Where does creator and creation seperate?
In the sentence before you say:
"I mean, there is truth to the idea that
spiritual growth is a kind of ascent toward "God", but it is also true that
this world is a manifestation of this same "God".
Mari says:
If the world is a manifestation of God then it too is DQ not SQ. It's like
a hologram as i see it: no matter how much you divide it into parts the
whole is always present with-in the part. SQ is another story ; )
Respectfully,
Mari
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 29 2002 - 12:17:06 GMT