From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 05:46:46 GMT
>But if you would like to tell me about the I Ching, go ahead.
I would only want to tell you about it if you don't know what it
is and want to know
>ERIN:
>>But as you read my posts to help correct your
>>thoughtful answers try to pretend you have not
>>taken an oath to the scientific cult to never consider
>>ideas outside of your religion.
>
>Actually, the Jungians (and Pirsig) are quite ambivalent and
>in some ways hypocritical in their attitudes toward science. No
>sooner do they belittle science than they ask for its expansion
>so that their dearest ideas can be admitted as such.
I don't think they belittle science. Certain dogmatic
scientists belittle their approach to science for
not conceptualizing it like they do.
People criticizing fundamentalists are not belittling religion just
their approach to religion.
Probably Jung considered this a problem of hers
>already, as she perhaps had the common sense to doubt some
>other conclusions of his over the course of her treatment.
>Glenn
Okay so you have enough common sense to diagnose the
doctor and the patient. I don't think truth is determined by majority vote.I
think it was common sense that had people thinking the world was flat too.
My 2 cents about your common sense.
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 02 2003 - 05:39:44 GMT