Re: MD the metaphysics of free-enterprise

From: Joseph Maurer (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Thu Aug 05 2004 - 17:30:02 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD MOQ psycology (?)"

    On 31 July 2004 5:13 PM Johnny writes to David:

    Johnny:

    You see, I don't think that mere contemplation and study, whether written in
    language or illustrated or mimed, or just daydreamed about, makes a new
    level above social patterns. I know that everyone here will say that I'm
    wrong about this, and I don't deny that thinking and pursuing and developing
    a field of thought is an intellectual activity, but I think that's not the
    same thing as being a fourth level pattern.

    I arrive at this awkward position because I am trying to make the
    relationship of each level to the ones above and below the same kind of
    relationship.

    Hi Johnny, David and all,

    joe: my view of MOQ evolution.

    Bo Skutvik tried to describe an intellectual pattern. It was difficult
    inasmuch as the inorganic, organic, or social patterns were not described in
    differentiated-pattern terms. It is enough to say that everyone knows what I
    mean when I talk about the different levels. I focus on the mystical
    experience of DQ! I get into deeper water!

    I go back to Pirsig's feeling of degeneracy when he made the division
    between DQ and SQ. I say there is a mystical experience of DQ and a
    degenerate mystical experience of a pattern of DQ. The pattern is SQ.

    I want to talk about Newton's creation of the law of gravity. Was Newton
    latching the dq of the inorganic order by an sq law of gravity? Is gravity
    experienced mystically by a baby, and by all?

    An organic, seeking food, has a purpose for action beyond gravity. The
    organic order 'purpose' does not seem to be the gravity of the inorganic
    order. Is 'purpose' an organic order pattern? 'Purpose' attracts arguments.
    What purpose? Whose purpose? Life is anti-gravity. Is organic dq value
    correctly interpreted as mystically experienced purpose? Memories of
    Tennyson, and What Is So Rare as a Day in June.

    The social order is a beginning for morality, three levels of activity,
    three values of dq to discriminate. Positive and negative cancel out
    producing neutral. Father, Mother, child, three? Morality! Existence! How a
    pattern exists will determine its place. A mystical connection to existence
    is necessary to determine order. IMO the social order begins a morality of
    three? Existence is experienced mystically. Like purpose and gravity it is
    never experienced outside a pattern. Is the mystical experience of existence
    subjective experience? No! Subjective experience is a pattern sq. A pattern
    experienced by the individual is created by value. Existence is part of that
    value. Is the mystical experience of existence truth? Existence as a value
    is indiscriminate. All things are possible. Truth is the value of order in
    an individual pattern, not the value of order itself. Freedom!

    Pirsig found a one-word metaphysics of 'quality' too limiting. Is there no
    other mystical experience outside of gravity, purpose, and existence? Bodvar
    Skutvik suggested s/o is a mystical experience of an intellectual order
    pattern. I add 'unfinished', 'outside of existence', as another element to
    the mystical experience of s/o. That is a huge tangle, 'unfinished s/o', to
    be mystical experience. Can all intellectual patterns be described as sq
    unfinished s/o? What about mathematics? What about coherence? What about
    law? Subjective, objective does not describe intellectual patterns. The MOQ
    is very specific about that!

    IMO the activity created by an 'unfinished s/o' pattern is both inside
    gravity, purpose and existence and outside of them? Is this the basis for
    the intellectual order? If it is then the intellectual might be said to be
    out of gravity, purpose and existence. The urge of unfinished in
    intellectual mystical experience is dogmatized into a religion in the order
    of existence by the intellectual order. Story-telling, faith, salesmanship,
    creativity, the groove and many other activities embody this unfinished s/o
    pattern!

    I mystically distinguish dq value in four orders. IMO dq is not existence
    outside these orders. Existence identifies the social order value. Dq in the
    inorganic, the organic, the social, and the intellectual order are values in
    those orders not a pool existing apart to be drawn from. IMO the existence
    of dq and the existence of God are not in the same order. Dq is an
    evolutionary value, God is an extension of social order value.

    Mystical experience is not degenerate-mystical quality. The intellectual
    order, though creative, is immoral when it denies mystical experience.
    According to the moq intellectual is at the top of the moral order. IMO an
    intellectual pattern forms out of mystical experience. In one sense I create
    myself. I am never finished, and the 'unfinished' aspect of s/o always looks
    to mystical experience for verification. Intersubjective agreement! As a
    sentient I am an inorganic, organic, social, intellectual being. As an
    intellectual pattern, I have work to do.

    More thoughts! IMO evolution is from the inorganic order. Each order evolves
    organic, social, and intellectual patterns in response to dq. Each order
    latches dq from the one below. IMO only from the order of existence can
    unfinished s/o evolve. Does this description of patterns help examine the
    relationships of each level to the ones above and below?

    I am unable to remember a published source for my formulation of these
    patterns. I hope they are in the spirit of Robert Pirsig, Joseph Campbell,
    and George Gurdjieff. As I reread this I am struck by the proofs for God's
    existence from Aquinas. The unmoved mover, the supreme goal, the order of
    existence, the creator the uncaused cause. Either I have been horribly
    prejudiced by my education, or mystical DQ has been observed, and used well
    or ill by many thinkers.

    Self-awareness, individuality, is another question.

    Joe Maurer

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 05 2004 - 17:29:57 BST