Re: [Spam] Re: MD the metaphysics of free enterprise

From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 06 2004 - 20:57:06 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: [Spam] Re: MD the metaphysics of free enterprise"

    Hi David,

    >Hi Johnny
    >
    >I think you might be getting the MOQ confused with Idealism,
    >what does existence mean in the MOQ, I cannot recall
    >much reference to this by Pirsig? any relevant quotes you have in mind?
    >What physics do you have in mind?

    Well, they are very similar, and they both say that the world "out there"'s
    existence is dependent on consciousness experiencing it. I think Idealism
    has a misunderstood connotation of things being able to be conjured into
    existence willy-nilly, but it has the same obedience to necessity that that
    MoQ has.

    In SOM, the rock exists as a rock, in the MoQ, the rock exists as a pattern
    of value that morally expects a rock to exist, in Idealism, the rock exists
    as an idea of a rock. In all three, the foot can kick the rock.

    The physics I am thinking of is John Archibald Wheeler's "participatory
    universe" and "It From Bit" theory. Wheeler was a contemporary of Einstein
    and is still alive and he's no nut (my dad kind of thinks he's a nut, he's a
    physicist too and saw his talk and had dinner with him once). It from Bit
    says that this an information-based universe, with everything being a binary
    yes or no response to questions asked by a consciousness. Those binary yes
    an no's are basically to the question of "should this pattern continue or
    not".

    Johnny

    >----- Original Message -----
    >From: "johnny moral" <johnnymoral@hotmail.com>
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:46 PM
    >Subject: Re: [Spam] Re: MD the metaphysics of free enterprise
    >
    >
    > > >Hi Johnny
    > > >
    > > >So say we discover a new type of tree.
    > > >Was it there before we discovered it?
    > > >Well it grew somehow!
    > > >
    > > >DM
    > >
    > >
    > > In SOM, yes, it was there before. In MoQ (and modern physics), no, it
    > > wasn't. Its existence and its history are newly created high quality
    > > patterns.
    > >
    > >
    > > Johnny

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to
    School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 06 2004 - 20:58:20 BST