From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Aug 07 2004 - 06:39:43 BST
Hi Mel, Chuck, all,
The Problem of Evil (POE) is being thrown around, but, so far,
reading Chuck and Mel (even though Mel's had four years of
philosophy) I don't get a sense that the problem's been properly
formulated. Here it is:
P1) God exists
P2) God is omniscient
P3) God is omnipotent
P4) God is benevolent
P5) The world is full of suffering not caused by man.
P5 is evident. Therefore God, as defined (P2-P4), does not exist.
And Mel, let's avoid Emergence here. I've looked into it, (thanks
for the links), and find it an interesting post-modernist diversion,
but hardly earth-shattering in its revelations. Given all the
jargon, I was expecting something more. The cowboy idiom is "Lotsa
hat and no cattle", or, to use your phrase, plenty of decoration.
Now, MOQers, substitute DQ for God in the above, and explain
yourselves. And, please, let's try not to say suffering is an
illusion.
Thanks to all, and let's RUMBLE!
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
-- InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983 Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is everything." -- Henri Poincare' MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 07 2004 - 06:34:22 BST