From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 09 2004 - 18:38:41 BST
David M:
>But you are being an idealist. The quality
>of the idea that hydrogen and oxygen existed before
>water is in time high quality vs the also correct
>statement that human knowledge encountered the concept of water before
>that of hydrogen and oxygen. But I have no time for idealist crap
>that pretends we cannot tell a clearly plausible story about the
>ontological evolution of being where hydrogen is in the story before
>water. Without the evolving levels MOQ becomes idealism and that
>seems to be your regression of it. But idealism is preferable to
>materialism
>and it is easy to fall into it when defending ourselves against materialism
>& SOM.
We can't help but tell a clearly plausible story about the evolution of
being. (But not the "ontological evolution", only the SOM, historical
evolution). Not sure where you get the idea that either idealism or the MoQ
is implausible "crap", or why you are so adamant of distinguishing Idealism
from MoQ.
Johnny
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfeeŽ
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 09 2004 - 19:00:05 BST