Re: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Sun Aug 22 2004 - 23:50:15 BST

  • Next message: Ian Glendinning: "Re: MD MOQ psycology (?)"

    Joe, I wasn't defining mysterious (or mystic) just explaining the sense in
    which I was using it.
    Like most words they've come a long way from their roots.
    Ian
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Joseph Maurer" <jhmau@sbcglobal.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 7:21 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis

    > On 20 August 2004 342:Pm Ian writes to Mark:
    >
    > Mark,
    >
    > You say "logic might and sometimes does produce better results."
    >
    > I say therefore, not because of the logic, but in spite of the logic. Not
    > actually connected with the logic in any causal way.
    >
    > Doxastic. Just wishful thinking. A desire to believe in logic. A refusal
    to
    > believe real (human) world outcomes are emergent from much more mysterious
    > (complex that is, not mystic) relationships than classical "scientific"
    > logic. (And highly politically incorrect for me suggest logic is just
    > wishful thinking, or that science is just political correctness.)
    >
    >
    > Hi Ian, Mark and all,
    >
    > joe: IMO mystic is not subjective. 'Mysterious' is as much a label as
    > 'mystic' and probably from the same root 'mystes' initiate. Hopefully, a
    > friendly reminder! "Complex" is rather mixed-up.
    >
    > Joe Maurer
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Ian Glendinning" <ian@psybertron.org>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 2:23 PM
    > Subject: Re: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis
    >
    >
    > > Mark,
    > >
    > > You say "logic might and sometimes does produce better results."
    > >
    > > I say therefore, not because of the logic, but in spite of the logic.
    Not
    > > actually connected with the logic in any causal way.
    > >
    > > Doxastic. Just wishful thinking. A desire to believe in logic. A refusal
    > to
    > > believe real (human) world outcomes are emergent from much more
    mysterious
    > > (complex that is, not mystic) relationships than classical "scientific"
    > > logic. (And highly politically incorrect for me suggest logic is just
    > > wishful thinking, or that science is just political correctness.)
    > >
    > > What I'm amazed by, given that this is an MOQ discussion board that so
    > many
    > > people defend the SOM logic.
    > >
    > > Ian Glendinning
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > From: "Mark Steven Heyman" <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:44 AM
    > > Subject: MD Fox News and Logical Analysis
    > >
    > >
    > > > Hi Ian, and all,
    > > >
    > > > msh said:
    > > > People use logical argument all the time in
    > > > their attempts to persuade, or to justify their actions. Bush and
    > > > Major [sic] and company offered at least 4 different arguments for
    > > > the invasion of Iraq, one after the other as each preceding argument
    > > > was proved fallacious. I think, using logical and evidentiary
    > > > analysis, the persuasiveness of an argument can be reduced to
    > > > near 0. Which in some circumstance might save lives.
    > > >
    > > > Ian replied ...
    > > > I don't understand Mark, unless you're being ironic.
    > > > Of course people continue to use logic to justify their actions,
    > > > both for and against war in your example, and yes (in theory) they
    > > > can reduce the argument to 0 (or equally 100%).
    > > > But look where it gets us - bad deciscions.
    > > > Logic is a triumph of wishful-thinking over reality.
    > > > Which brings me back to the political correctness thread.
    > > >
    > > > msh says:
    > > > Well, I guess I'm being ironic in the sense that I'm assuming that
    > > > the commercial media will provide equal coverage to all sides of an
    > > > argument, and that policy-makers in a putative democracy will be
    > > > influenced by the opinion of the majority. Since this in no way
    > > > resembles the world in which we live, yes, irony reigns supreme.
    > > >
    > > > However, for fun, let's assume my two preposterous premises. In the
    > > > case
    > > > of the most recent attack on Iraq, here's what would have happened
    > > > (Ian,
    > > > substitute the British equivalents):
    > > >
    > > > 1) People like Scott Ritter, Dennis Halliday, Hans von Sponeck,
    > > > Michael Parenti, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, Robert Fisk, Robert
    > > > Parry, Alexander Cockburn would have received as much air and print
    > > > exposure as people like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Hannity and
    > > > Whats-his name, Dan Rather, Ted Koppel, Peter Jennings, Jim Leher,
    > > > Gordon Liddy, Oliver North, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Connie
    > > > Rice, Cheney and Bush.
    > > >
    > > > 2) Had this happened, the people of the US and Britain would have
    > > > had more than enough information to recognize the bullshit evidence
    > > > and bad logic advanced by their leaders for the purpose of justifying
    > > > a
    > > > murderous attack on a harmless and defenseless nation as the only way
    > > > of
    > > > removing a vicious tyrant who, only a few years before, still vicious
    > > > and
    > > > tyrannical, had been the darling of the same Western Powers who now
    > > > sought
    > > > his destruction.
    > > >
    > > > 3) Armed with this information, the people of the US and GB, (again,
    > > > in
    > > > my hypothetical world where governments are not owned by business and
    > > > therefore respond to the will of the of the people) might very well
    > > > have
    > > > prevented the slaughter of thousands upon thousands of human beings
    > > > who
    > > > were no threat to anyone and had less to do with the 9-11 attacks
    > > > than any
    > > > tax-paying American (or Briton) who cheered or, worse, remained
    > > > silent.
    > > >
    > > > Ian, this is how logic and evidentiary analysis might, and sometimes
    > > > does, save lives.
    > > >
    > > > O Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood...
    > > >
    > > > Best,
    > > > Mark (msh)
    > > > --
    > > > InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    > > > Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    > > > Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    > > >
    > > > "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    > > > everything." -- Henri Poincare'
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    > > > Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    > > > Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    > > >
    > > > "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    > > > everything." -- Henri Poincare'
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    > > > --
    > > > InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    > > > Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    > > > Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    > > > everything." -- Henri Poincare'
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 22 2004 - 23:56:09 BST