Re: MD The future of the MOQ

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 21:31:45 BST

  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD The empirical verifiability of value"

    nice!!!!
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "ml" <mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 4:18 PM
    Subject: Re: MD The future of the MOQ

    > 'morning David,
    >
    > You certainly got the focus
    > tuned to 'extra sharp' on that one.
    > I fear there is too much true in
    > your sentence about much of our
    > 'scientific culture' and education
    > systems. Political agendas are
    > almost completely static...
    >
    > There is an interesting group you
    > might look at for restoring the faith
    > in a possibly bright future for
    > science. There are some fairly
    > free thoughts floating around.
    >
    > http://www.edge.org/
    >
    > I have found some of the play of
    > ideas fascinating. Let me know
    > what you think.
    >
    > thanks--mel
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:31 PM
    > Subject: Re: MD The future of the MOQ
    >
    >
    > > One key thing seems to be that
    > > science is very good at modelling SQ
    > > but more often these days it is coming
    > > up against DQ.
    > >
    > > DM
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: "ml" <mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 11:40 PM
    > > Subject: Re: MD The future of the MOQ
    > >
    > >
    > > > MoQ should have an intellectual future
    > > > or maybe a post-intellectual future.
    > > > To get there we may need to concentrate
    > > > on what level is most important to explore
    > > > and how to frame the future.
    > > >
    > > > We speak an SOM structured language
    > > > which implicitly reduces our thinking, if
    > > > not always our discussion to something
    > > > SOM-ish.
    > > >
    > > > Counting up the subject matter in this
    > > > discussion, it will be overwhelmingly
    > > > about social matter. It is what is
    > > > important to individuals at times, but
    > > > I would question whether the social
    > > > is our best focus for the long view.
    > > >
    > > > To my perception only a few of the
    > > > things written, (including my own)
    > > > have had the ring of MoQ novelty or
    > > > felt like it extended the MoQ itself.
    > > >
    > > > That might be why RMP has written
    > > > so many books so quickly ;-)
    > > >
    > > > Tough going to get along the road...
    > > >
    > > > thanks--mel
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: "David Morey" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    > > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 12:23 PM
    > > > Subject: Re: MD The future of the MOQ
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > > Hi all
    > > > >
    > > > > I ask, has the MOQ got an intellectual future?
    > > > >
    > > > > I see some possible trends that approach the MOQ:
    > > > > Wilber & self-help & new-age holism, Roy Bhaskar's
    > > > > stratified being & philosophy of freedom, certain ideas
    > > > > in the new physics that are anti-determinist
    > > > > & anti-reductionist, the anti-essentialism
    > > > > of post-modernism, other trends & possibilities.
    > > > > The seeking of something after the death of god.
    > > > > Charles Taylor's 'Sources of the Self' and other
    > > > > calls to re-examine the sources of values.
    > > > >
    > > > > What do others see/hope for?
    > > > >
    > > > > regards
    > > > > David M
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > > >
    > > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 27 2004 - 21:41:07 BST