Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.

From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 20:59:08 BST

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD The future of the MOQ"

    Wim

    I could imagine a society where we speng/use/give
    our money/resurces much more wisely & even
    pleasurably, but currently rather low quality behaviour
    allows people to accumulate money, etc

    DM

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Wim Nusselder" <wim.nusselder@antenna.nl>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:51 AM
    Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.

    > Dear David M.,
    >
    > I wrote 25 Jun 2004 08:09:25 +0200:
    > 'Moral principles and other justifications for behaviour are a whole
    > different (4th level) chapter and -in my opinion- not the subject of this
    > thread. Let me just say that progressive taxation is not perceived in the
    > Netherlands (by the majority) as a way to equalize wealth, but as the
    > fairest way of sharing the burden that we have taken upon us collectively:
    > the strongest shoulders should carry the largest part.'
    >
    > You wrote 26 Jun 2004 13:47:09 +0100:
    > 'I would like to see the case between equality and inequality argued from
    > both point of view. I think both are inadequate ways of thinking.'
    >
    > 3rd level patterns of value are (for me) patterns of behaviour. Our
    > descriptions of 3rd level patterns of value apply 4th level patterns of
    > value (ways of thinking). In this thread my goal would be to understand
    how
    > 3rd level patterns of value maintain societies and how they evolve. Given
    > the presumption of the MoQ that evolution (at least in the long run)
    follows
    > the 'right' (moral) direction, 'towards DQ', such a description tells us
    how
    > DQ operates at the 3rd level.
    > An aspect of that description of how 3rd level patterns of value evolve
    > would be a description of how 4th level patterns of value influence this
    > evolution. In my opinion the MoQ assumptions about the relations between
    > levels imply, that this 4th level influence on 3rd level evolution is
    > marginal (it cannot speed up 3rd level evolution, which operates by
    creation
    > and copying of habitual behaviour), but essential (it 'embodies' for most
    or
    > all part how DQ operates at the 3rd level).
    >
    > 'Making a case for' equality or inequality is part of the (discussion)
    > process that determines which 4rd level patterns of value are in the best
    > position (being participated in by enough people) to influence 3rd level
    > evolution. It is about 'what direction SHOULD 3rd level evolution take'
    and
    > 'what SHOULD we do to contribute'. As I said: in the Netherlands the
    > 'strongest shoulders, heaviest burdens' idea is in the best position to
    > influence 3rd level evolution. The first idea you argued for ('everyone to
    > have basic provisions ... so that they can flourish and we can see what
    > quality they have to find in themselves and perhaps also offer society')
    is
    > also generally accepted in the Netherlands (it justifies our social
    security
    > system, one of the burdens we have taken upon us collectively). The second
    > idea you argued for ('we need to decide what we are going to do with the
    > extra
    > resources. At the moment we allow people to use them for all kinds of low
    > and high quality activity. Surely we
    > need to find a way of using our resources more for high tha[n for l]ow
    > quality activity?') is not. It justifies communist, state-directed use of
    > all resources, based on the assumption that all resources are collective
    (in
    > practice: state-)property. In the Netherlands all but a very small
    minority
    > assume resources to be individual property and the state to have only the
    > right (given by voters) to set a few preconditions on their use.
    >
    > With friendly greetings,
    >
    > Wim
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 27 2004 - 21:18:56 BST