From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Aug 30 2004 - 21:47:48 BST
Hi Ham,
Your wrote
> Hence, I must take issue with the MOQer's insistence in putting Quality
> first. Neither Quality nor Value can exist without individual sensibility,
> and nothing exists without a Creator.
I think you're onto what I've also seen as a problem with the MOQ, only
you have explained it better than I -- a lack of recognition of the
individual due to a pervasive "collectivist conception of man." I have
argued to change the intellectual level to the individual level in order
to represent man's moral elevation from tribalism to individual liberty,
when a man is recognized and revered as an end in himself, not the means
to the ends of others.
It will be interesting to see the reaction of others to your insight. I
bet it won't be pleasant.
Best,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 30 2004 - 21:43:55 BST