From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 15:24:01 BST
Illya - FYI ...
http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/maslow.html
Ian Glendinning
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ilya Korobkov" <korobkov_ilya@mail.ru>
To: "Valuemetaphysics@aol.com" <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: MD hierarchy of static patterns - coherence
> Hi Mark, hello all.
>
> I want to ask your opinion what is the best way to describe the
> changes that occur in the hierarchy of static patterns that compose
> a man.
>
> I'll try to explain what I mean. A man is composed of four
> levels of static patterns, and each pattern responds to DQ
> independently. At different times of his life a man responds to DQ
> predominantly on one level or on the other. For example, a toddler
> responds to DQ predominantly on biological level, teenager - on social
> level, an adult - on intellectual level. And even fully grown-up man
> may respond to DQ predominantly on biological level when he is devoid
> of air, food, water or sex for a long enough time. Or predominantly
> on social level, when he is homeless and insecure.
>
> The hierarchy of dominance of static patterns at any given time
> describes very well person's subjective reality: what "he" needs, what
> "he" values. But more or less often changes in this hierarchy occur.
> "We" begin to value other things, not the things we had valued before.
> When we are hungry we value most food. But when we satisfy hunger we
> begin to value most good company, or good book. We do not value food
> any more.
>
> May we coin a term to describe this phenomenon? - I mean, the
> phenomenon of changes in the hierarchy of static patterns?
>
>
> And another question. Is it correct to say that in coherent state
> all levels of static patterns that compose a man value one object?
> (They certainly value different ASPECTS of this object, but anyway.)
> Take love, fore example. When it is true love, we value one object on
> biological, social and intellectual levels simultaneously, don't we?
> And because all levels of patterns value one object no conflicts
> between them arise. All patterns "work in parallel" and are not aware
> of each other. Isn't it what you call coherence, Mark?
>
> Friendly yours,
> Ilya
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 31 2004 - 16:01:55 BST