MD hierarchy of static patterns - coherence

From: Ilya Korobkov (korobkov_ilya@mail.ru)
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 13:15:58 BST

  • Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD The empirical verifiability of value"

    Hi Mark, hello all.

    I want to ask your opinion what is the best way to describe the
    changes that occur in the hierarchy of static patterns that compose
    a man.

    I'll try to explain what I mean. A man is composed of four
    levels of static patterns, and each pattern responds to DQ
    independently. At different times of his life a man responds to DQ
    predominantly on one level or on the other. For example, a toddler
    responds to DQ predominantly on biological level, teenager - on social
    level, an adult - on intellectual level. And even fully grown-up man
    may respond to DQ predominantly on biological level when he is devoid
    of air, food, water or sex for a long enough time. Or predominantly
    on social level, when he is homeless and insecure.

    The hierarchy of dominance of static patterns at any given time
    describes very well person's subjective reality: what "he" needs, what
    "he" values. But more or less often changes in this hierarchy occur.
    "We" begin to value other things, not the things we had valued before.
    When we are hungry we value most food. But when we satisfy hunger we
    begin to value most good company, or good book. We do not value food
    any more.

    May we coin a term to describe this phenomenon? - I mean, the
    phenomenon of changes in the hierarchy of static patterns?

    And another question. Is it correct to say that in coherent state
    all levels of static patterns that compose a man value one object?
    (They certainly value different ASPECTS of this object, but anyway.)
    Take love, fore example. When it is true love, we value one object on
    biological, social and intellectual levels simultaneously, don't we?
    And because all levels of patterns value one object no conflicts
    between them arise. All patterns "work in parallel" and are not aware
    of each other. Isn't it what you call coherence, Mark?

    Friendly yours,
     Ilya

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 31 2004 - 13:36:28 BST