MD Re: Non-empiricist definition of DQ

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 07:22:57 BST

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: RE; MD the individual in the MOQ"

    Dear Chris,

    I read in your 18 Aug 2004 15:23:39 -0400 contribution a valuable idea to
    define DQ-as-goal (towards which patterns of value migrate) as
    'yet-to-be-filled evolutionary niches. Possibilities.' Is that an acceptable
    summary?
    It implies that DQ consists of that which doesn't exist (yet). That's
    sufficiently paradoxical to counter the MoQ dogma that DQ can't/shouldn't be
    defined...

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 02 2004 - 07:37:16 BST