Re: MD the quality of equality

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 07:14:00 BST

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "MD Re: Non-empiricist definition of DQ"

    Dear Platt,

    You wrote 17 Aug 2004 11:20:32 -0400:
    'If I understand you gentlemen correctly, you're saying that (according to
    the MOQ) equality is good within a society, that is, among the individuals
    who are members of a society. To put it another way, no individual in a
    given society ought to be considered better than another. In contrast,
    equality is not good between societies, i.e., it's only right and proper
    to consider that some societies are better than others.'

    A certain amount of equality is necessary to maintain social stability. The
    whole of humanity is part of one society (even if people also belong to
    different sub-societies), so on a global scale a certain amount of equality
    is also necessary.
    A certain amount of equivalence of societies and of members of societies
    should be recognized to maintain consistency of systems of ideas that deal
    with the rights and duties of societies and their members. E.g. a system of
    ideas that contains the idea that everyone is born with equal, unalienable
    rights cannot allow too much difference in rights between those who belong
    and don't belong to a specific society.

    A certain amount of inequality and inequivalence is inevitable because of
    competition among societies and among systems of ideas and is necessary for
    social resp. intellectual evolution.

    Both systems of ideas and societies can be judged as to how far they are
    advanced in intellectual resp. social evolution: by their stability,
    versatility and harmony with higher level patterns of value and openness to
    DQ. Judging individuals is difficult, because the social and intellectual
    patterns of value they identify with (and can be identified with) shift.

    To the extent that my own ideas are clear and their consistency is not
    challenged, I don't really care whether (and if yes, why) Pirsig's ideas are
    inconsistent regarding equality.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 02 2004 - 07:14:02 BST