From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Sep 04 2004 - 10:23:30 BST
Hi Scott
very Kantian, how far do you stick to Kant & does the MOQ
differ from Kant?
DM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@earthlink.net>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science
> Mel,
>
> > I am afraid that I do not see how an independent
> > notion of time (apart from relative movement) is required.
> > If it is I need to understand it.
>
> One doesn't need an independent notion of time apart from relative
> movement. What one needs is a notion of eternity so that one can speak of
> movement being observed, that can capture the succession of instants as a
> movement of a continuing thing, or, alternatively, that denies that there
> is any succession of instants in the first place. What I am getting at is
> that if one assumes separated things and events (which we call spacetime)
> as the basis of reality then one cannot have mind. So, I argue, the
> separation into things and events (the creation of spacetime) is the
> product of perception, that perception turns an eternal whatever (e.g. the
> quantum universe) into a spatio-temporal organization.
>
> - Scott
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 04 2004 - 11:26:57 BST