RE: Re[2]: MD The problem of one self and four discrete levels of static patterns

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Fri Sep 10 2004 - 22:49:35 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD A bit of reasoning"

    Ilya Korobkov said:
    Your answer does help, really! I made a mistake trying to identify self
    with static patterns or with the relationships between static patterns.
    The ultimate self I had in mind during the discussion shouldn't and may
    not be equated with patterned reality. - Did I understand you
    correctly?

    dmb says:
    Right. The Ultimate self ought not be equated with static patterns BECAUSE
    static patterns, especially the ones that constitute the little self, are
    constantly shifting and evolving. Our static selves change and grow so
    rapidly that its just not possible to pin down who you are in any final way.
    Even the cultural and historical contexts that inform us will give way to
    new and different contexts. In static reality, we and the ground we stand
    upon is constantly evolving and so never ultimate.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 10 2004 - 22:51:12 BST