From: Scott Roberts (jse885@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 21:11:50 BST
David M,
> Personally I think you are looking
> in the wrong place to address these
> problems. I think the problem can be
> solved by looking at the difference between
> SQ that is experienced via perception
> and SQ that is experienced but not
> projected into the perceptual realm
> of 3d space.
Actually, I do not believe these problems can be solved, just as one cannot
describe "emptiness", for example. The best we can do is restate them in
the logic of contradictory identity so their inherent insolvability is more
obvious. So the "solution" is to treat this contradictory identity as
fundamental. Anything else is idolatry: the attempt to understand by
ignoring one side or the other of the contradiction, and treating the other
as fundamental by itself. The MOQ almost got there, with its Quality/DQ/SQ
triunity, but then lost it when it failed to realize that
Quality/Subject/Object is a different focus on the same triunity.
There is no problem detecting a difference between perception and
imagination. The problem is why they both exist, and how they work and
interact.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 13 2004 - 21:21:40 BST