Re: MD MOQ DQ SQ Awareness

From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Sun Oct 03 2004 - 10:53:37 BST

  • Next message: MarshaV: "MD Where are Women?"

    Hi David,

    I'm sure it is a good explanation, but I think what I'm really wanting is
    to look into my own eyes. Understanding is something I seem only able to
    touch with my fingertips, never to fully grasp.

    MarshaV

    At 08:12 PM 10/2/2004 +0100, you wrote:
    >Hi all
    >
    >How do/can we describe awareness in the MOQ in terms or SQ & DQ?
    >
    >To begin with, within the small whole of my experience I am aware of
    >everything.
    >What I am not aware of I do not experience. Awareness is clearly
    >fundamental.
    >I value the patterns I am aware of differently. Some I take little notice
    >of, but
    >it is clearly worthwhile keeping my eye on them or else they drift out of my
    >awareness. I move around. Patterns absent themselves from my awareness
    >and others appear: as I move from the hall to the kitchen. I describe and
    >know
    >patterns through general/universal concepts such as 'kitchen' or 'hall'. And
    >these
    >patterns contain other patterns like 'taps' and 'walls'. And all these
    >patterns are
    >contained in larger patterns like house, country, world, cosmos, up to the
    >largest
    >pattern I have some experience of, i.e. the universe. All these patterns
    >change
    >and keep changing the overall pattern that is the little wholeness and
    >everything
    >of myself. Some patterns have special qualities. They can change the
    >body-patterns
    >within my whole-self of experience. Like big rocks falling on my head. My
    >body patterns
    >are special. They clearly try to sustain themselves. If they are injured
    >they mend.
    >Other patterns effect me, they make me see what I call red or blue, or smell
    >something,
    >etc. My experience of everything over the time of my life is a collection of
    >patterns that
    >have effected those patterns that seem to be self organising and
    >controlling. My self
    >organisation patterns can also influence those patterns that seem to be
    >organised
    >by an intention that is not entirely my own. I know that there are many
    >other living
    >self-organising patterns that come into the realm of my little whole-self.
    >In this realm
    >these others influence my self-organising patterns and I can influence
    >their's.
    >They are clearly aware of patterns too.
    >
    >In fact is it not the most obvious conclusion that any self-organising
    >pattern that responds
    >to other patterns must have some form of awareness? Or can anyone argue for
    >an
    >animate/inanimate distinction in the MOQ?
    >
    >I see one proabable realm of inanimate interaction of patterns and that is
    >when a pattern
    >is unable to maintain itself in the presence of another pattern, when it is
    >overwhelmed.
    >EG when the cow pattern eats the grass pattern, or when a bigger atom steals
    >the electron
    >from a smaller atom (part joke). This is the end of a pattern of
    >self-organising awareness.
    >We call it death. I think patterns interact with each other across space:
    >near/far/touching.
    >I think self-organising patterns interact over time with themselves, this is
    >memory
    >and inner awareness. Self-organisation is causality across time. So far
    >science has
    >concentrated on the causality of patterns interacting in space with each
    >other. The
    >science of self-organisation across time has had less attention. The
    >self-whole-experience
    >is the interaction of self-organisation 'within' across time, and
    >interaction with other self-
    >organising patterns that are outside our inner self-organisation but are
    >within our realm
    >of self-experience awareness.
    >
    >Knowledge is just how well we are able to create patterns within our
    >self-organisation
    >(via society,language,etc) that simulate how other patterns of
    >self-organisation operate.
    >So we can duck the ball being thrown at us, etc.
    >
    >Make any sense.
    >
    >regards
    >David Morey
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 03 2004 - 10:56:12 BST