Re: MD Gardner on Pragmatism

From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 03:18:04 GMT

  • Next message: Glenn Bradford: "RE: MD Absolutely objective"

    Hey again David,
    Begging aside...

    DMB says:
     ... it seems the pragmatists were reacting to something, but its a mystery
    to me and would like to know what particular bee got under their bonnets.

    RICK offers:
    Here's a passage that suggests James did in fact have his sights aimed at
    metaphysics (at least in part)....

    WILLIAM JAMES (from 'Pragmatism', 1907, chap.2)
        Metaphysics has usually followed a very primitive kind of quest. You
    know how men have always hankered after unlawful magic, and you know what a
    great part in magic words have always played. If you have his name, or the
    formula of incantation that binds him, you can control the spirit, genie,
    afrite, or whatever the power may be. Solomon knew the names of all the
    spirits, and having their names, he held them subject to his will. So the
    universe has always appeared to the natural mind as a kind of enigma, of
    which the key must be sought in the shape of some illuminating or
    power-bringing word or name. That word names the universe's principle, and
    to possess it is after a fashion to possess the universe itself. 'God,'
    'Matter,' 'Reason,' 'the Absolute,' 'Energy,' are so many solving names.
    You can rest when you have them. You are at the end of your metaphysical
    quest.
        But if you follow the pragmatic method, you cannot look on any such word
    as closing your quest. You must bring out of each word its practical
    cash-value, set it at work within the stream of your experience. It appears
    less as a solution, then, than as a program for more work, and more
    particularly as an indication of the ways in which existing realities may be
    changed.

    RICK
        On a side note, I've always felt that this passage casts some doubt onto
    Pirsig's claim that the Metaphysics of Quality is an extension of
    pragmatism. I can't help but to think that James would view Pirsig's
    "Quality" and "Dynamic Quality" as merely two more of the "solving names"
    which he seems regard with disdain in this passage. James contrasts
    Pragmatism to the solving names of metaphysics and offers it as an
    alternative to such linguistic solutions. The Metaphysics of Quality seems
    in many ways to be just sort of philosophy that James was trying to
    'debunk'.

    rick

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 20 2003 - 03:15:12 GMT