Re: MD Moral values in the election

From: Arlo Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 04 2004 - 16:04:27 GMT

  • Next message: Richard Loggins: "RE: MD Where does quality reside?"

    Platt wrote:

    >Thanks to the MoQ, what I detected in those who said they voted for Bush
    >because of moral values was the conflict between social and biological
    >values. Pirsig put it in a nutshell:
    >
    >"Vice is a conflict between biological quality and social quality. Things
    >like sex and booze and drugs and- tobacco have a high biological quality,
    >that is, they feel good, but are harmful for social reasons. They take all
    >your money. They break up your family. They threaten the stability of the
    >community." (Lila, 13)
    >
    >What many voters instinctively saw in current American culture was
    >acceptance by many of the "If it feels good, do it" philosophy of the
    >60's Hippies. In Lila, Chap. 24., Pirsig describes how this desire for
    >"freedom from social restraint" led to the current state of affairs where
    >promiscuous sex is glorified and erectile function is a major concern,
    >resulting in the backlash expressed in the election.

    What Platt misses, and what has been repeatedly argued, is that this was
    not a victory of "social over biological", it was a victory of "social over
    intellectual". Even if one accepts the skewed belief that the only thing
    the "hippies of the 60's" fought for was sexual promiscuity, todays'
    liberals are the ones who brought civil equality, women's rights, fair
    wages for labor, workers' compensation, and the rights of individuals over
    society to bear. We have challenged the right-ist propaganda of social
    Darwinism. The rights the "right" have fought for are the rights of
    corporations and wealth, that the poor deserve their lot in life due to
    laziness, inability or sloth, that all things are reducible to a financial
    bottom line. When we question the validity of the current war (intellectual
    level), we are drummed out by idiotic cries of patriotism and accused of
    being traitors (social level). When we argue that any couple should be able
    to enjoy the same state-benefits as any other couple receiving state
    benefits (intellectual level), we are drummed out by dark-age fear of the
    gays (social level). When we seek to protect our natural landmarks from
    corporate abuse (intellectual level), we are drummed out by monetary
    desires of corporations (social level). They have used fear to spread a
    wave of xenophobia, fear that the intellectual will end the social (as it
    should, morally) to convince people to return to an even greater level of
    social level control.

    Funny how one can trumpet "freedom" so loudly when it serves financial
    interests, but denounce it so readily when it serves any other interest at
    all.

    As Sidney Blumenthal, a leftist response to the likes of the rightists
    Limbaugh et al, writes in the Salon, "[t]he evangelical churches became
    instruments of political organization. Ideology was enforced as theology,
    turning nonconformity into sin, and the faithful, following voter guides
    with biblical literalism, were shepherded to the polls as though to the
    rapture", as continues "[t]hese emotions were linked to what is
    euphemistically called "moral values," which is actually social and sexual
    panic over the rights of women and gender roles... Only imposing manly
    authority against "girlie men," girls and lurking terrorists can save the
    nation.". Finally, "They grafted imperial unilateralism onto provincial
    isolationism. Fear of the rest of the world was to be mastered with
    contempt for it."

    The democrats are certainly not a perfect ideological platform. Both sides
    should receive equal criticism when they use the social to quell the
    intellectual.

    But this newspeak warping by the neo-cons into "social over biological" is
    nothing to be proud of, or thankful for, at all. What we are witnessing in
    America is an aggressive campaign of de-enlightenment. Very, very, very sad.

    Arlo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 04 2004 - 17:41:39 GMT