MD On Heyman's Arrogance

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Nov 13 2004 - 18:41:16 GMT

  • Next message: PhaedrusWolf@aol.com: "Re: MD Where does quality reside?"

    Hi all,

    I'm so arrogant I need my own thread to discuss my arrogance. :-)

    On 13 Nov 2004 at 10:09, Platt Holden wrote:
    msh said to ian:
    And thanks for the moral support re my line of argument here. When
    I first got involved with the list six months ago I was gung ho,
    thinking everyone I met was really interested in discovering some
    MoQ based consensus of "the truth." After numerous long discussions
    with various people, discussions wherein it was obvious my point was
    made, as my final arguments were left unanswered, I was dismayed to
    see the same people, a few posts later, talking to someone new but
    starting over spewing the same old shit. That's when I realized that
    most folks here (there are exceptions and Scott is one of them) are
    looking to promote one or another religious or political or anti-
    intellectual agenda, and that their interest in "truth" is but a
    convenient pose.

    platt:
    Of course, msh has a monopoly on "truth" so that anyone who deigns to
    disagree with him (except Scott) is obviously a deceitful, ignorant
    boob. The arrogance of such assertions is not lost on contributors to
    this forum, anymore than similar elitist chest-pounding was lost on
    millions who voted to re-elect Bush.

    msh says:
    Platt's right. My statement above sounds way more arrogant than I'd
    intended, though I did intend a little arrogance. Here's what I
    should have said:

    That's when I realized that some folks here are looking to promote
    one or another religious or political or anti- intellectual, or anti-
    scientific agenda, and that their interest in "truth" is but a
    convenient pose.

    Of course there are many, many exceptions and Scott is one of them,
    as are Rich, Sam, DMB, and anyone else who is willing to doubt or
    shift their position in response to persuasive argument and evidence.

    This has nothing to do with whether or not someone agrees with me.
    In fact, I'm not looking for people to agree with me; I want people
    who think I'm wrong to convince me I'm wrong.

    Best to all,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    --
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com

    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything." -- Henri Poincare'

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 14 2004 - 05:55:50 GMT