Re: MD the worst thing about 9/11 according to the MoQ

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Nov 14 2004 - 18:41:28 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "RE: MD Moral values and the election"

    Hi Sam,

    > Firstly, does Pirsig believe and argue that
    > genocide is immoral? Second, does the MoQ support that argument?

    > So I will ask once more: in what way does the MoQ give value to people as
    > such, rather than to the patterns of value of which people are composed?

    > If anyone else wants to try, I'd be delighted to pursue the matter in a
    > more reasonable fashion. In the meantime, I shall just be more confirmed
    > that there is a glaring hole in the MoQ.

    Pirsig might argue that the MOQ regards people as the source of ideas and
    therefore it is immoral to kill them "as such" unless they threaten to
    kill others. I'm thinking here of his discussion of capital punishment in
    Chapter 13 of Lila:

    "What makes killing him immoral is that a criminal is not just a
    biological organism. He is not even just a defective unit of society.
    Whenever you kill a human being you are killing a source of thought too. A
    human being is a collection of ideas, and these 13ideas take moral
    precedence over a society. Ideas are patterns of value. They are at a
    higher level of evolution than social patterns of value. Just as it is
    more moral for a doctor to kill a germ than a patient, so it is more moral
    for an idea to kill a society than it is for a society to kill an idea.
    And beyond that is an even more compelling reason; societies and thoughts
    and principles themselves are no more than sets of static patterns. These
    patterns can't by themselves perceive or adjust to Dynamic Quality. Only a
    living being can do that."

    So, besides being composites of lower patterns of value, people are the
    source of the intellectual level since they think (manipulate symbols).
    Furthermore, they are the only current "composites" capable of responding
    to DQ.

    Naturally if one group (like radical Muslims) threaten genocide on another
    group (like Christians), then the threatened group is morally justified to
    take preemptive measures to wipe the threateners out.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 14 2004 - 19:23:25 GMT