RE: MD Gardner on Pragmatism

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jan 26 2003 - 19:55:11 GMT

  • Next message: Horse: "Re: MD Lila's Child"

    Matt and all:

    Matt:
    Yeah, I believe that's what I said when I said,
    "he's saying that believers think that metaphors have cognitive meaning
    (and are therefore important) and atheists don't think they have cognitive
    meaning (and are therefore unimportant). If what he means is something
    along the Davidsonian lines I drew above (which I think he might given "God
    is a metaphor for that which trancends all levels of intellectual
    thought."), then Campbell would say the fact/lie distinction should be
    blurred. Metaphors don't have cognitive meaning, but that doesn't mean they
    aren't important."

    DMB says:
    Here's my problem. As I said, "Cognitive meaning? I honestly don't know what
    that means." And since this phrase seems so central to the point you were
    trying to make, I could hardly make any sense of it. I would have hoped that
    you'd respond with an explanation of that phrase. (You seem to rely on
    obscure jargon so frequently that I very rarely have any idea what you're
    talking about.) Anyway, I did a google search and looked it up. There are
    references to it in many fields, but in this case the appropriate usage
    comes from Logical Postivism. For those who are equally perplexed here's
    what I found: "COGNITVE meaning - An utterance has COGNITVE MEANING if and
    only if it is either true or false." So now that I have an idea what this
    key phrase means, it is clear that both the atheist and the believer think
    it has cognitive meaning and this is precisely their mistake. And it seems
    to me that Campbell does not say the "fact/lie distinction should be
    blurred", but thrown on the trash heap altogether. How's that?

    C'mon, Matt. Don't you think its perfectly reasonable to ask for a little
    clarity? Don't you think one of the most important goals here is to be
    understood? Don't you think its unfair and unhelpful to employ such obscure
    phrases without explaining what they mean? I do.

    Hugs and kisses,
    DMB

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 26 2003 - 19:56:25 GMT