From: John Howard (john66@attbi.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 05:50:51 GMT
>RICK
> So what would be the difference between saying "B *values* precondition
>A" and "B *loves* precondition A"? To me it sounds though the difference
is
>one of intensity. Maybe "love" is the label applied to the relationships
>with the patterns we value most intensely.
Right! I remember this part, he was saying that "A causes B" is "B values
precondition A", and I agree "love" fits in here very well, virtually
synonomously. I'd also say that B is what is expected given precondition A,
and love is the will to do what is expected.
> By this explanation of Love, we really can see Love at work in all
>levels of the MoQ. Since all patterns at all levels value things, they can
>love as well.
Yeah, anything doing what is expected is loving. Water turning to steam
when it is boiled is loving, a very faithful and unwaveringly strong love.
If we expect a rock to fall on our foot, it is love that carries out our
expectaion and actually makes the rock fall on your foot. (It's not
"gravity", or "electromagnetism" - it is love)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 05:48:49 GMT