Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2005 - 21:56:06 GMT

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

    I am having a trouble reconciling the first couple of your statements with the next couple of statemetns, could you clarify please.

    I1)"an apple falls irrespective of the theories concerning why and how
    these events happen."

    2)Was there consciousness before the biological level came into being? No.

    with

    3)"To deny that values are self-contained is to re-introduce SOM via having a
    “senser” and “something sensed”."

    4) and assuming that "certianly not before them" was just a typo
    " the fundamental tenet of the MOQ i.e. that (ontologically) values
    come before subjects and objects, not simultaneously with them and certainly
    not before them."

    Erin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 20 2005 - 22:13:55 GMT