Re: MD Access to Quality

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 28 2005 - 04:14:52 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Access to Quality"

    Platt,

    You asked
    "How come you feel the need supply reinforcements?"

    I say, because your contributions are the kind of reactionary extreme
    politically motivated twaddle that should only be hanfled with
    overwhelming force. Argument is clearly pointless; worse, you seem to
    enjoy it.

    Ian

    On 4/28/05, Mark Steven Heyman <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com> wrote:
    > > On 25 Apr 2005 at 18:27, Platt Holden wrote to Arlo:
    > >
    > > Christianity never "wielded power" for 2000 years. That's what I
    > > mean by your distortion of history.
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > A slight exaggeration perhaps, but hardly a distortion. History is
    > > distorted when the fact that millions of innocent people have been
    > > killed by the USG in the last 150 years, much of this imperialist
    > > mayhem carried out well before there was anything like communism to
    > > "defend" us from, is sort of jammed down the memory hole by
    > > apologists for US policy.
    >
    > platt:
    > Evidence? And not from Chomsky, Zinn or one of your other leftist
    > gurus, please.
    >
    > msh says:
    > I've given you tons of verifiable evidence over the last year. And
    > you won't believe it no matter who says it, as long as it contradicts
    > your childlike view of American foreign policy. But here's something
    > from a reporter who witnessed the US invasion of the Philippines in
    > 1901, this was before reporters were "embedded" with military units
    > and were able to write about what they actually saw:
    >
    > "Our men have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners
    > and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of 10
    > up.... Our soldiers have pumped salt water into men to "make them
    > talk," and have taken prisoners people who held up their hands and
    > peacefully surrendered, and an hour later. . . stood them on a bridge
    > and shot them down one by one, to drop into the water below and float
    > down, as examples to those who found their bullet-loaded corpses."
    >
    > - Philadelphia Ledger newspaper in 1901, from its Manila
    > [Philippines] correspondent during the US war with Spain for the
    > control of the Philippines
    >
    > > platt to arlo:
    > > Your assumption is that all governments, whether Christian or
    > > secular, are guilty of initiating brutality on a scale equal to
    > > modern secular communism. That's patently false.
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > No, it's demonstrably true. Turn off Bill O'Reilley and Rush
    > > Limbaugh, and read a book, will ya? Besides, the brutality of
    > > Stalin was no more about atheism than the US slaughter of millions
    > > in SE Asia was about Christianity.
    >
    > Are you referring to the U.S. vs. Japan in World War II? It would
    > help if you could be specific and cite evidence rather than spew
    > broad generalizations.
    >
    > msh says:
    > Last I heard, Japan hadn't been moved to Southeast Asia. Would a
    > quote from Richard Nixon be specific enough?
    >
    > "The only place you and I disagree . . . is with regard to the
    > bombing. You're so goddamned concerned about the civilians, and I (in
    > contrast) don't give a damn. I don't care.". . . "I'd rather use the
    > nuclear bomb. . . Does that bother you? I just want you to think
    > big."
    >
    > - Richard Nixon to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on the
    > Watergate tapes
    >
    >
    > > platt misconstrues arlo:
    > > Oh my God. You compare Bush to Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot?
    > > That's worse than DMB lumping Pat Robertson with Hitler. Have you
    > no
    > > understanding of the checks and balances that prevent any American
    > > president from attaining unbridled power?
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > This is so incredibly naïve that I, for once, am speechless. This
    > > is a sixth grader's understanding of the American political system.
    >
    > platt:
    > Why don't you give us the first grader's understanding then?
    >
    > msh laughs:
    > All right. That's so funny I'm gonna let you off the hook....
    >
    > > but platt drives on:
    > > Can you not grasp the reality that in order to attain Marx's goal
    > of
    > > eliminating economic inequalities that a concentration of political
    > > power is necessary, providing an open invitation to dictators?
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > Again, this is about 180 degrees out of phase. A far greater
    > > concentration of political and military power is required to keep
    > > and expand the economic inequalities.
    >
    > platt:
    > I thought you guys were against free market capitalism because it
    > caused economic inequalities and want to use the coercive power of
    > government to redistribute income in the name of "social justice."
    >
    > msh:
    > I don't know if I'm against free-market capitalism; no such socio-
    > economic system exists. I have seen the great disparities of wealth
    > and privilege created by state-supported capitalist systems, however,
    > and yes, I would like to do something about it. But I don't think
    > I'll have to come and take your Buick at gunpoint. So relax.
    >
    > > platt, tirelessly:
    > > Your approval of Marx suggest support for dictatorship since his
    > > vision could not possibly be carried out except by a totalitarian
    > > government, as the history of the 20th century proves. .
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > Saying Stalin was influenced by Marx is like saying GWB is
    > > influenced by Jesus. If you actually had some understanding of the
    > > history of the 20th century, you would know that there have been
    > > successful non- totalitarian implementations of communist theory,
    > > always on a small scale because if there is any possibility of
    > > larger success such implementations immediately become targets of
    > US
    > > aggression.
    >
    > ham:
    > Where, pray tell, are these small scale "implementations of communist
    > theory?" Cuba perhaps?
    >
    > msh says:
    > Actually, Cuba, despite its dictatorship, has far better health,
    > education, and other services for it's poor than does the US, the
    > wealthiest most privileged country on earth. And this was
    > accomplished and maintained in the face of now more than 40 years of
    > American embargoes and other more directly violent acts of terrorism.
    >
    > But I wasn't thinking of Cuba. Cuba, like Nicaragua in the 80's,
    > was too big a success to be left free of American aggression. I was
    > thinking of the Mondragon Cooperatives in Spain; or the kibbutzim
    > founded 40 years before the establishment of the State of Israel.
    >
    > platt:
    > And if they really exist and are so wonderful, how come you're not
    > there?
    >
    > msh says:
    > Cause I want to stay here and bug people like you.
    >
    > msh said:
    > Why is a brutal implementation of a pseudo--communist system
    > sufficient for you to detest communism? The pseudo--capitalist
    > system best represented by the US has its own clear record of
    > genocide, and, far from fearing this system, you apparently LOVE
    > it. I think this goes a long way toward explaining why the memory
    > hole is so important to you.
    >
    > platt:
    > Your "clear record of genocide" is nothing compared to the record set
    > by your communist friends. Have you no sense of proportion?
    >
    > msh says:
    > You mean the mass murderers who called themselves Communists. They
    > weren't my friends. So 3 million you can live, but 6 or 10 million
    > is just TOO much?
    >
    > Best,
    > Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    >
    > --
    > InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    > Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    > Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    >
    > " ... the United States, for generations, has sustained two parallel
    > but opposed states of mind about military atrocities and human
    > rights: one of U.S. benevolence, generally held by the public, and
    > the other of ends-justify-the-means brutality sponsored by
    > counterinsurgency specialists. Normally the specialists carry out
    > their actions in remote locations with little notice in the national
    > press. That allows the public to sustain its faith in a just America,
    > while hard-nosed security and economic interests are still protected
    > in secret. " -
    >
    > Robert Parry, an acclaimed investigative reporter and author who will
    > never be a guest on Rush Limbaugh.
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 28 2005 - 04:21:22 BST