Re: MD Quality and the Nuremberg-Tokyo Tribunals

From: David Harding (davidharding@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 18:39:50 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Quality and the Nuremberg-Tokyo Tribunals"

    Ant Said:
    "The attempt to deny the close relationship between philosophy and
    politics is a misguided project to re-define philosophy on MOQ Discuss
    to make it an insipid talking shop of the Anglo-American (whitish)
    middle classes. If you don’t like Plato’s understanding of it or think
    Pirsig’s pragmatist project of improving the American legal system is a
    non-starter, then maybe you should consider joining some other
    Discussion group looking at post-modernism or some other ostrich
    creating ideology. "

    Hi Ant et al,

    To add; an attempt to deny the close relationship between philosophy and
    politics is not a misguided project to re-define philosophy, it is a
    misguided attempt to re-define politics, and this division is important.

    I agree, most non-philosophers I meet on any given day, hold the opinion
    that philosophy has nothing to do with the 'real world'. To them
    philosophy is all just concepts and ideas that don't really do anything
    of importance, and theoretically they're not entirely wrong. With the
    current SOM there has been no grounding for these intellectual values to
    take hold and have been merely passed off as "just descriptions" about
    reality and not reality itself.

    As you say, an appreciation of the MOQ distinctions based in quality
    would eliminate this problem as philosophy would become a very important
    part of a politicians life and after all, fundamentally philosophy is
    based in society. However this is where the connection ends. The
    exclusivity of intellectual values from social values is certainly not
    something to be overestimated, but it's not something to be
    underestimated either. This conflict is important but I think whenever
    possible emphasis should go with intellect. There is no better static
    good than intellectual freedom and this should not be suffocated by
    blind politicking. So, claiming that 'denying philosophy has a close
    relationship with politics is misguided' to me is not entirely correct,
    yet 'denying politics has a close relationship with philosophy is
    misguided' to me, is correct.

    Regards,

    David.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 30 2005 - 19:59:34 BST