Re: MD Racist Remarks

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Tue Jul 26 2005 - 19:42:28 BST

  • Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD generalised propositional truths"

    Hi Sam, and all,

    On 25 Jul 2005 at 16:16, Sam Norton wrote:

    msh 7-23-05:
    Here's another bigoted ill-informed and unsupported opinion,
    recently posted:

    "I'm satisfied that the answer to the Why question is simply that
    it's better to exist than not. But of course that answer won't
    satisfy everybody, especially Muslim terrorists who gladly blow
    themselves out of existence so as to be rewarded with an eternity of
    fornication. "

    The ignorance and bigotry behind the phrase "Muslim Terrorist" has
    been pointed out by Ant McWatt. The ignorance of the quote in
    general will be obvious to anyone who explores the real reasons
    behind so-called terrorists attacks.

    sam 7-25-05
    The trouble is that those who carry out these acts *describe
    themselves* as Muslim,

    msh 7-26-05:
    But they don't describe themselves as "Muslim Terrorists." To
    suggest that the use of the phrase in this case is purely descriptive
    is disingenuous of you. The combination of the terms is meant to
    convey a fundamental connection between them, which is further
    entrenched through repetition followed by comments such as "who
    gladly blow themselves out of existence so as to be rewarded with an
    eternity of fornication. "

    sam 7-25-05:
    Moreover, the roots of the terrorist acts do go deeply into
    particular traditions of Islamic theology, in so far as I understand
    them (NOT mainstream ones I hasten to add, where suicide, and
    especially the murder of a fellow muslim, is seen as the greatest sin
    possible). But they are drawn from the wahhabi tradition, coming down
    via people like Qutb. Perhaps calling them 'Qutbists' would be more
    accurate - but waiting for the journalistic professionals to get that
    sophisticated might require a lot of patience.

    msh 7-26-05:
    The desire for an "eternity of fornication" goes deeply into some
    traditions of Islamic theology? This may be true, but I doubt it; I
    don't know enough about the wahhabi tradition, or Outb, to make a
    judgement. Perhaps Khaled can provide more information. Are you
    suggesting that the author of the offending remark is well-versed in
    the wahhabi tradition, that the intent of his remark was merely to
    add a little historical background to the discussion? Please, my
    friend. The "eternity of fornication" stuff is right out of
    Limbaugh, not Outb.

    sam 7-25-05:
    Also, calling them 'muslim' seems no less accurate than calling
    various of the organisations that support George Bush 'Christian',
    and as that is conventionally accepted, both on this forum and
    elsewhere, I see no reason why the same loose short-hand should be
    objected to when referring to the terrorist acts.

    msh 7-26-05:
    Again, the phrase that's being objected to is "Muslim Terrorist," as
    used in the way it is in the offered quotes. Lemme know when people
    on this list start referring to GWB and Blair as "Christian
    Terrorists," doing what they do to secure a blissful eternity in
    heaven. I'll be the first to object to such remarks.

    sam 7-25-05:
    If we are to abandon the word 'muslim' as an adjective in this
    context, might we also abandon the use of the word 'Christian' when
    describing the crusades and the Inquisition?

    msh 7-26-05:
    We need to be careful in using EITHER adjective. I would strongly
    object to anyone who characterizes the Inquisition and Crusades as an
    expression of Christian theology; they were an obscene aberration of
    Christian theology conducted by people interested in maintaining and
    expanding power.

    sam 7-25-05:
    Finally, the phrase about 'real reasons' begs a few too many
    questions.

    msh 7-26-05:
    I don't see this as begging a question, but as a rational request
    that we thoroughly explore what's behind these attacks, rather than
    write them off as being carried out by a bunch of whackos looking to
    get laid in heaven.

    sam 7-25-05:
    Of all the reasons that might apply to a 21 year old British citizen
    blowing himself and other people up on the tube, what
    I think is of most importance are the ones that make him different to
    all the other 21 year old muslims coming from Leeds, who didn't
    choose that course of action.

    msh 7-26-05:
    Well, if I were a Londoner riding the tube, the important question
    would be, why are more and more people opting for terrorism as a
    means of expressing political dissent? That 21 year old British
    citizen wasn't born with the idea to blow himself up. Every report
    indicates that terrorist attacks are INCREASING dramatically
    throughout the world, just as predicted, not only by guys like Zinn,
    Parenti, Chomsky, but by our own intelligence services. What's
    wrong with asking why?

    sam 7-25-05:
    If 'real reasons' ignores any question of his personal choice in the
    matter then it is reducing him to a thing, no longer responsible for
    his own actions, and that is as demeaning and dehumanising as it
    gets. Or are you saying that different standards apply? I can't
    imagine a more precisely racist perspective than that.

    msh 7-26-05:
    I agree he made a personal choice. As above, the important question
    is what drove him to it? You can dismiss him for now as an
    "aberration" of your society (what makes him different to all the
    other 21 year old muslims coming from Leeds), but this does nothing
    to help us understand, and predict, when the next kid from Leeds or
    elsewhere in England or the world, makes the same choice. And, also
    above, the numbers of such "aberations" is clearly increasing.

    sam 7-25-05:
    There's only one race: human. I'm sure we're agreed on that.

    msh 7-26-05:
    Some of us are agreed on that. Not nearly enough, not yet, I'm
    afraid. And the sort of comments criticized in this thread only
    drive the wedge deeper.

    Best,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his 
    government"
     - Edward Abbey
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 26 2005 - 20:55:03 BST