Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of

From: platootje@netscape.net
Date: Sun Sep 04 2005 - 15:44:24 BST

  • Next message: David M: "Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of"

    Ham,

    I've found out I agree with you on a lot of issues, this post however not being one of them.

    You wrote:
    >Can there be any doubt that there's something very different about pain?

    Yes

    >The stove and the body sitting on it are universally definable objects whose
    >existence can be empirically established. Pain is a proprietary sensation,
    >the awareness of which can only be experienced by the person feeling it.

    You talk about the stove, not the mental picture of the stove as seen by person A
    You talk about a person, not the mental picture of this person as seen by person B
    Yet you talk about the pain, and not about the heat of the stove...

     It's a subjective "feeling"; it's what the individual knows is real
    >because he is directly in touch with it. You can't feel my pain, no matter
    >how empathetic you are, but you can't deny its reality to me.

    You can't see 'my' stove either. But just because one is a picture and the other a feeling, doesn't make them that much different as you say.

     Is pain due
    >to trauma that irritates the nerve endings, sending messages of distress to
    >the brain? In materialistic terms, yes; but that's the circuit "schematic",
    >the routing and processing of information as electrical pulses. You can
    >dissect this neuronic tissue cell by cell but you won't find the pain.

    Same goes for the mental picture, it's not heat damaging nerve-ends, but fotons doing something in the eye, that causes a signal down the nerve, etc.

    >Everything in the universe, including the universe as a whole, is an "other"
    >to me. Yet, my awareness, my feelings, my thoughts, my concepts, my values
    >are all identified with my conscious self and no one else's. Without them I
    >am nothing. Because consciousness is uniquely proprietary to every
    >individual, the experience of reality is likewise proprietary. Moreover, if
    >the individual's experience is what creates or structures this reality,
    >essentially we're dealing with a "subjective" world.

    Yes, your body provide you all the right circumstances for developing an ego.

     If it weren't for the
    >"universality" (i.e., commonality) of empirical knowledge, we would have
    >concluded long ago that physical reality is a solipsism.

    This empirical knowledge is just as illusionairy as a 'self', albeit on a different level maybe...

    >
    >The fact that the intellect, awareness or consciousness has a biological
    >contingency -- that we couldn't experience without a brain and nervous
    >system that evolved from Nature, that we can measure nerve energy in
    >microvolts, or make consciousness dysfunctional by chemical injection, or
    >that we can compile the thoughts and ideas of individuals into a cultural
    >database called "Intellect" -- all this is beside the point. Because
    >conscious awareness is subjective it is unlike anything else in the realm of
    >scientific or philosophical investigation. We can't create it, localize it,
    >measure it, universalize it, predict it, or even prove it. But, if the
    >truth be told, it's the most "genuine" reality we have.

    It's probably the very last thing that seperates us from the source/Essence/unity....

    >Have I sparked any new ideas, or do you all fail to see the relevancy of
    >this rambling discourse?

    I'll wait a little longer before drawing too many conclusions.

    Kind regards,
    Reinier.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
    As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

    Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

    New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
    Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
    Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 22:04:36 BST